Overview
Product Information on Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking
What is Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking?
Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking Pricing
Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking Product Images






Fluid Attacks helps companies to develop secure software without delays. We are an all-in-one solution that helps you accurately find and remediate vulnerabilities throughout the SDLC. Our solution combines automation, AI and pentesters to perform AI SAST, SAST, DAST, SCA, SCR, PTaaS and RE. This way, we provide you with accurate knowledge of the security status of your application. We enable your DevSecOps implementation. This means security goes alongside innovation without hindering your speed. Fluid Attacks provides you with expert knowledge about vulnerabilities and support options that enable you to remediate the security issues in your application.
Do You Manage Peer Insights at Fluid Attacks?
Access Vendor Portal to update and manage your profile.
I have several points to highlight. I appreciate that they don't just generate automated reports; they have real people validating the projects and findings. The automated review via bots is excellent, allowing us to be more agile in our development and deployments. The vulnerabilities are very clear in the tool, so much so that they provide evidence and examples of how to exploit them. Its easy integration with development IDEs like Visual Studio Code or Cursor allows you to view the list of findings by component. Additionally, the integration support for using Fluid's AI is a plus, allowing you to ask questions and receive suggestions on how to resolve the findings. The platform's recommendations for solutions are very good and applicable.
the distribution of the information on the platform.
What I like most is that it allows for the early detection of security vulnerabilities and provides clear information for the development team. As a backend developer, I find it very useful because the findings are actionable, making it easier to understand the risk, prioritize fixes, and apply improvements directly to the code.
Sometimes responses to re-attacks can be slow, impacting timelines. Some reports are false positives or difficult to close because Fluid staff lack context about the development process.
I can't see which controls are performing in a specific moment.
What I like least is that, sometimes, after making a fix, the validation of the finding can take a while. This creates some uncertainty because, as a developer, you want to quickly confirm whether the adjustment was sufficient or if any further changes are needed. I don't consider this a major drawback, because I understand that validation processes require review and precision. However, it would be an opportunity for improvement to have faster feedback after correcting the findings, to close issues more quickly and continue with the development flow without so much waiting.