• HOME
  • CATEGORIES

    • CATEGORIES

    • Browse All Categories
  • FOR VENDORS

    • FOR VENDORS

    • Log In to Vendor Portal
    • Get Started
  • REVIEWS

    • REVIEWS

    • Write a Review
    • Product Reviews
    • Vendor Directory
    • Product Comparisons
  • GARTNER PEER COMMUNITY™
  • GARTNER.COM
  • Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQPrivacyTerms of Service
    ©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
    All rights reserved.
  • Categories

    • No categories available

      Browse All Categories

      Select a category to view markets

  • For Vendors

    • Log In to Vendor Portal 

    • Get Started 

  • Write a Review

Join / Sign In

Overview

Product Information on Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking

Updated 18th March 2026

What is Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking?

Fluid Attacks helps teams prevent, detect, manage, and remediate vulnerabilities with precision by combining our AI-native scanners, deterministic scanners, and certified penetration testers. Together, they deliver AI SAST, SAST, SCA, DAST, SCR, PtaaS, and RE to continuously reduce your attack surface. This approach ensures security keeps pace with innovation, without slowing development. Fluid Attacks provides expert insight into vulnerabilities and the guidance needed to remediate them effectively, so you can build and release software with confidence.

Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking Pricing

Essential Plan: This option is designed for teams seeking fast insights into risk exposure through Fluid Attacks' scanning tool. It includes vulnerability scanning, with pricing based on the number of apps tested. Advanced Plan: This plan is intended for teams focused on speed and accuracy in identifying risk. It features vulnerability scanning, AI, and expert intelligence. Pricing is determined by the number of apps and the number of authors contributing code to the repository.

Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking Product Images

Vulnerability view
Vulnerability view
Analytics view
Analytics view
Remediation
Remediation

Overall experience with Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking

Software Developer
1B - 3B USD, Banking
FAVORABLE

“Platform Centralizes Vulnerability Management and Facilitates Integration in Development”

5.0
Apr 14, 2026
Our overall experience with Fluid Attacks has been extremely positive. Their platform is very user-friendly and intuitive, allowing for centralized vulnerability management and risk tracking. Another key differentiator is their team. The staff is always attentive and available to answer any questions or concerns, providing personalized support that makes our work as developers much easier. It's a service that not only detects vulnerabilities but also truly contributes to achieving our business objectives by enabling us to deliver secure software continuously.
Automated Translation from Spanish
IT Security & Risk Management Associate
500M - 1B USD, Banking
CRITICAL

“Platform Offers Clear Information Layout but Lacks Real-Time Control Monitoring”

3.0
Nov 25, 2025
This is my first time using this tool. Actually I'm ending my first month using it.

Key Insights

A Snapshot of What Matters - Based on Validated User Reviews

Peer Discussions

Powered by Google TranslateThis service may contain translations provided by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement. Gartner's use of this provider is for operational purposes and does not constitute an endorsement of its products or services.

Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences, and should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in this content nor makes any warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this content, about its accuracy or completeness, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use apply.


Software reviews and ratings for EMMS, BI, CRM, MDM, analytics, security and other platforms - Peer Insights by Gartner
Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQsPrivacyTerms of Use

©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking
Logo of Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking

Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking

byFluid Attacks
in
4.7

About Company

Company Description

Updated 20th February 2026

Fluid Attacks helps companies to develop secure software without delays. We are an all-in-one solution that helps you accurately find and remediate vulnerabilities throughout the SDLC. Our solution combines automation, AI and pentesters to perform AI SAST, SAST, DAST, SCA, SCR, PTaaS and RE. This way, we provide you with accurate knowledge of the security status of your application. We enable your DevSecOps implementation. This means security goes alongside innovation without hindering your speed. Fluid Attacks provides you with expert knowledge about vulnerabilities and support options that enable you to remediate the security issues in your application.

Company Details

Updated 20th February 2026
Year Founded
2001
Head office location
San Francisco, United States
Number of employees
51 - 200
Website
https://fluidattacks.com

Do You Manage Peer Insights at Fluid Attacks?

Access Vendor Portal to update and manage your profile.

User Sentiment About Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking
Reviewer Insights for: Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking
Deciding Factors: Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking Vs. Market Average
Performance of Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking Across Market Features

Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking Likes & Dislikes

Like

I have several points to highlight. I appreciate that they don't just generate automated reports; they have real people validating the projects and findings. The automated review via bots is excellent, allowing us to be more agile in our development and deployments. The vulnerabilities are very clear in the tool, so much so that they provide evidence and examples of how to exploit them. Its easy integration with development IDEs like Visual Studio Code or Cursor allows you to view the list of findings by component. Additionally, the integration support for using Fluid's AI is a plus, allowing you to ask questions and receive suggestions on how to resolve the findings. The platform's recommendations for solutions are very good and applicable.

Automated Translation from Spanish
Like

the distribution of the information on the platform.

Like

What I like most is that it allows for the early detection of security vulnerabilities and provides clear information for the development team. As a backend developer, I find it very useful because the findings are actionable, making it easier to understand the risk, prioritize fixes, and apply improvements directly to the code.

Automated Translation from Spanish
Dislike

Sometimes responses to re-attacks can be slow, impacting timelines. Some reports are false positives or difficult to close because Fluid staff lack context about the development process.

Automated Translation from Spanish
Dislike

I can't see which controls are performing in a specific moment.

Dislike

What I like least is that, sometimes, after making a fix, the validation of the finding can take a while. This creates some uncertainty because, as a developer, you want to quickly confirm whether the adjustment was sufficient or if any further changes are needed. I don't consider this a major drawback, because I understand that validation processes require review and precision. However, it would be an opportunity for improvement to have faster feedback after correcting the findings, to close issues more quickly and continue with the development flow without so much waiting.

Automated Translation from Spanish

Recommended Gartner Insights

  • Critical Capabilities for Application Security Testing
  • Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing

Top Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking Alternatives

Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking Reviews and Ratings

Logo of Veracode
1. Veracode
4.6
(407 Ratings)
Logo of Checkmarx SAST
2. Checkmarx SAST
4.6
(401 Ratings)
Logo of Appknox
3. Appknox
4.8
(257 Ratings)
View All Alternatives
Filter Reviews
Sort By:
Most helpful
Last 12 Months
Star Rating
Reviewer Type
Reviewer's Company Size
Reviewer's Industry
Reviewer's Region
Reviewer's Job Function
  • Software Developer
    1B-10B USD
    Banking
    Review Source

    Platform Centralizes Vulnerability Management and Facilitates Integration in Development

    5.0
    Apr 14, 2026
    Our overall experience with Fluid Attacks has been extremely positive. Their platform is very user-friendly and intuitive, allowing for centralized vulnerability management and risk tracking. Another key differentiator is their team. The staff is always attentive and available to answer any questions or concerns, providing personalized support that makes our work as developers much easier. It's a service that not only detects vulnerabilities but also truly contributes to achieving our business objectives by enabling us to deliver secure software continuously.
    Automated Translation from Spanish
  • Software Developer
    1B-10B USD
    Banking
    Review Source

    Fluid Attacks: A useful tool for strengthening security from the development stage

    5.0
    Apr 30, 2026
    My overall experience with Fluid Attacks has been very positive. As a backend developer, I believe the tool adds significant value to the development lifecycle, as it allows for the timely, clear, and actionable identification of vulnerabilities and security findings.
    Automated Translation from Spanish
  • Software Developer
    1B-10B USD
    Banking
    Review Source

    The training covered real-time code analysis before releases

    5.0
    May 14, 2026
    The talk was tailored to the team's needs, and the person was qualified to provide guidance and answer any questions that arose. Furthermore, follow-up was conducted to share updates about the platform. I find that the platform, now with the implementation of AI, is much more user-friendly and easier to understand. So far, whenever I've needed to get my questions answered, the response time has been excellent.
    Automated Translation from Spanish
  • Chief Information Officer
    <50M USD
    Software
    Review Source

    Strong security partner with excellent support; UI have room to improve

    5.0
    Feb 9, 2026
    Our experience with Fluid Attacks has been largely positive. The platform has effectively helped us identify real programmatic security issues and open vulnerabilities that have improved our overall security posture. The support team has been a strong partner during infrastructure changes and product evolution The API can be slower at times (typically 5-7 seconds per response) and the MCP server output can sometimes be too extensive, requiring iteration and more precise questions to extract value, but once it is done, it becomes a fundamentally useful tool in our workflow. Overall, the benefits of the platform have clearly outweighed these limitations
  • Manager of IT Services
    Gov't/PS/Ed
    Education
    Review Source

    Positive Experience with Fluid Attacks: Clear Visibility and Helpful Suggestions

    5.0
    Mar 12, 2026
    My overall experience with the Fluid Attacks platform has been very positive. It's intuitive, reliable, and provides clear visibility into security findings, making it easy to prioritize and effectively address vulnerabilities.
    Automated Translation from Spanish
...
Showing Result 1-5 of 316

Showing data for 314 ratings and reviews for Application Security Testing market. View all 314 ratings and reviews across markets for a complete picture.

4.7

(314 Ratings)

Rating Distribution

5 Star
76%
4 Star
23%
3 Star
1%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%
Why ratings and reviews count differ?

Customer Experience

Evaluation & Contracting

4.6

Integration & Deployment

4.7

Service & Support

4.8

Product Capabilities

4.7