• HOME
  • CATEGORIES

    • CATEGORIES

    • Browse All Categories
  • FOR VENDORS

    • FOR VENDORS

    • Log In to Vendor Portal
    • Get Started
  • REVIEWS

    • REVIEWS

    • Write a Review
    • Product Reviews
    • Vendor Directory
    • Product Comparisons
  • GARTNER PEER COMMUNITY™
  • GARTNER.COM
  • Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQPrivacyTerms of Service
    ©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
    All rights reserved.
  • Categories

    • No categories available

      Browse All Categories

      Select a category to view markets

  • For Vendors

    • Log In to Vendor Portal 

    • Get Started 

  • Write a Review

Join / Sign In
 in  Market

Reviews

in
0.0
0 Reviews
OverviewReviewsLikes and Dislikes

Ratings Overview

Review weighting

mail_outlineEmail Page
4.4
0 Reviews (All Time)

Rating Distribution

Distribution based on 0 ratings


Customer Experience

Evaluation & Contracting
4.4
 
 
 
 
 
Integration & Deployment
4.5
 
 
 
 
 
Service & Support
4.5
 
 
 
 
 
Product Capabilities
4.4
 
 
 
 
 

Overall experience with

How helpful reviews are selected


Favorable Review

5.0
April 20, 2026
Product: Atera

Patch Management Effective for Microsoft Systems, Lacking Support for Google Platforms

Critical Review

3.0
December 11, 2025
Product: Atera

Insufficient Customization and Asset Updates Present Operational Challenges

Likes and dislikes about

likes

Scheduling features such as scheduled restarts upon a successful Windows Update. The ability to create different policies around the many modules for granular-level control

April 20, 2026

dislikes

1. Unable to assign devices or assets as the ticket owner so that I can keep track of reoccurring issues with the device. (since the device can be reused with another user) 2. I can't retire a device, if a device is no longer being used, I have to leave it alone and let it look like it is still active or delete it from the system. 3. We have 2 tenants, and the product only supports 1 tenant. This means our users cannot log into the program to look up KB articles or create their tickets that way, they have to send in an email to create a ticket. This means they cannot track their ticket status without sending in another email asking about their ticket. 4. Would like to have the ability to create banners for VIP users so it shows a high priority to the ticket better than the average ticket. 5. Would like the ability to add in more Activity Status, the 4 they have are nice but there are more that I would like to add in

December 11, 2025

Powered by Google TranslateThis service may contain translations provided by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement. Gartner's use of this provider is for operational purposes and does not constitute an endorsement of its products or services.
Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences, and should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in this content nor makes any warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this content, about its accuracy or completeness, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
  • Community Guidelines
  • Listing Guidelines
  • Browse Vendors
  • Rules of Engagement
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
©
 
©