It's a more enterprise-ready Kubernetes platform out of the box. One of the biggest strengths is the consistency across different environments. Having a common platform model across private cloud and other infrastructure was key, because we were building a hybrid infrastructure and wanted to keep the deployment experience consistent for our users. The enterprise controls and security model is a major reason it fits well for our use case, where platform risk, access control and compliance all matter equally as much. It's a good fit for vendor-agnostic approaches. You're pretty much able to lift and shift your entire infra to a vanilla Kubernetes deployment if you set it up carefully.
April 2, 2026
The architecture is too much oriented to the Workload farm model. The security aspect is lagging behind. No real day 0 solution is available to fully segment and secure internal communication. It requires external solutions to be plugged into the tenant's This complexity pushes administrators to simply bypass security, even if they come from an infrastructure where all servers/VMs/loads are fully segmented and communication explicitly allowed by a firewall.
April 7, 2026