• HOME
  • CATEGORIES

    • CATEGORIES

    • Browse All Categories
  • FOR VENDORS

    • FOR VENDORS

    • Log In to Vendor Portal
    • Get Started
  • REVIEWS

    • REVIEWS

    • Write a Review
    • Product Reviews
    • Vendor Directory
    • Product Comparisons
  • GARTNER PEER COMMUNITY™
  • GARTNER.COM
  • Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQPrivacyTerms of Service
    ©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
    All rights reserved.
  • Categories

    • No categories available

      Browse All Categories

      Select a category to view markets

  • For Vendors

    • Log In to Vendor Portal 

    • Get Started 

  • Write a Review

Join / Sign In
 in  Market

Reviews

in
0.0
0 Reviews
OverviewReviewsLikes and Dislikes

Ratings Overview

Review weighting

mail_outlineEmail Page
4.0
0 Reviews (All Time)

Rating Distribution

Distribution based on 0 ratings


Customer Experience

Evaluation & Contracting
4.0
 
 
 
 
 
Integration & Deployment
3.9
 
 
 
 
 
Service & Support
4.1
 
 
 
 
 
Product Capabilities
4.1
 
 
 
 
 

Overall experience with

How helpful reviews are selected


Favorable Review

5.0
April 28, 2026
Product: Jenzabar One

Transition to Jenzabar One Brings Operational Improvements and Staff Adaptation Challenges

Critical Review

3.0
April 30, 2026
Product: Jenzabar SONIS

Enhanced Search Functionality Appreciated but Application Portal Remains Difficult to Use

Likes and dislikes about

likes

1) Core student modules work very well for advising, registration, and other core student services. 2) Staff like the functionality and interface of the Jenzabar One Web and are finally migrating to the web environment after operating in Desktop for many years. 3) Regular (at least annual) updates that include operational improvements, many of which come from user feedback and suggestions.

April 28, 2026

dislikes

Our Admissions team struggles greatly with the Application portal. That is extremely cumbersome to make changes when needed and the look and feel is really poor. It doesn't present our institution in a good light I feel by having such an old and poor GUI / UX interface for users.

April 30, 2026

Powered by Google TranslateThis service may contain translations provided by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement. Gartner's use of this provider is for operational purposes and does not constitute an endorsement of its products or services.
Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences, and should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in this content nor makes any warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this content, about its accuracy or completeness, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
  • Community Guidelines
  • Listing Guidelines
  • Browse Vendors
  • Rules of Engagement
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
©
 
©