• HOME
  • CATEGORIES

    • CATEGORIES

    • Browse All Categories
  • FOR VENDORS

    • FOR VENDORS

    • Log In to Vendor Portal
    • Get Started
  • REVIEWS

    • REVIEWS

    • Write a Review
    • Product Reviews
    • Vendor Directory
    • Product Comparisons
  • GARTNER PEER COMMUNITY™
  • GARTNER.COM
  • Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQPrivacyTerms of Service
    ©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
    All rights reserved.
  • Categories

    • No categories available

      Browse All Categories

      Select a category to view markets

  • For Vendors

    • Log In to Vendor Portal 

    • Get Started 

  • Write a Review

Join / Sign In
 in  Market

Reviews

in
0.0
0 Reviews
OverviewReviewsLikes and Dislikes

Ratings Overview

Review weighting

mail_outlineEmail Page
4.2
0 Reviews (All Time)

Rating Distribution

Distribution based on 0 ratings


Customer Experience

Evaluation & Contracting
4.5
 
 
 
 
 
Integration & Deployment
4.4
 
 
 
 
 
Service & Support
4.6
 
 
 
 
 
Product Capabilities
4.2
 
 
 
 
 

Overall experience with

How helpful reviews are selected


Favorable Review

4.0
February 27, 2026
Product: Mend

Efficient Supply Chain Security With Mend

Critical Review

3.0
February 25, 2026
Product: Mend

Mend Platform Offers Broad Coverage but Faces Documentation and Support Issues

Likes and dislikes about

likes

The platform integrates into existing workflows, allowing developers to identify and remediate supply chain vulnerabilities without leaving their environment. The Mend team has been incredibly responsive and quick to remediate any issues we encountered. Automated tools for dependency updates significantly reduce the manual effort required to maintain a secure and up-to-date software supply chain. We also found that they beat other vendors to include new critical zero-day vulnerabilities in their database.

February 27, 2026

dislikes

Response times and required follow-ups from the Vendor are sometimes slow for priority ticket requests. Documentation can be hard to follow or out-of-date. Transitive dependency scanning requires a lot of manual effort. Some functionality requires deeper validation than the initial Vendor claims. Knowledge, pro-activeness and awareness of deprecated features of third party integrations with Mend is not up-to-date e.g Deprecation of PAT tokens in Azure DevOps

February 25, 2026

Powered by Google TranslateThis service may contain translations provided by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement. Gartner's use of this provider is for operational purposes and does not constitute an endorsement of its products or services.
Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences, and should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in this content nor makes any warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this content, about its accuracy or completeness, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
  • Community Guidelines
  • Listing Guidelines
  • Browse Vendors
  • Rules of Engagement
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
©
 
©