Overview
Product Information on EY ESG Compass
What is EY ESG Compass?
EY ESG Compass Pricing
Overall experience with EY ESG Compass
“Structured Approach Replaces Spreadsheet Scramble in Carbon Inventory and Reporting Cycles”
About Company
Company Description
EY concentrates its efforts on improving the mechanisms of the working world by supporting the creation of enduring value for multiple stakeholders. Fueled by data and technology, EY's internationally dispersed teams facilitate the growth, transformation, and operation of client businesses by providing assurance services. With a multidisciplinary approach encompassing assurance, consulting, law, strategy, tax, and transactions, EY professionals strive to devise innovative solutions for today's intricate global concerns by asking perceptive questions.
Company Details
Do You Manage Peer Insights at EY?
Access Vendor Portal to update and manage your profile.
Key Insights
A Snapshot of What Matters - Based on Validated User Reviews
Top EY ESG Compass Alternatives
Peer Discussions
EY ESG Compass Reviews and Ratings
- Senior Software Engineer50M-1B USDIT ServicesReview Source
Structured Approach Replaces Spreadsheet Scramble in Carbon Inventory and Reporting Cycles
A dedicated carbon accounting and management platform has been one of the few tools that actuall brought order to our ESG work instead of adding more noise. It helped turn carbon reporting from a once-a-year scramble in spreadsheets into a living dataset that operations finance and sustanibility teams can all work with. Day to day ESG compass feels like the central place where all our emissions data comes together: activity data, emission factors, scopes and locations all sit in a structured model instead of being buried in individual files and emails. Once we configured our organizational bounddaries and key methodologies, preparing inventories and updating numbers across scopes went from weeks of manual chasing to a responsible process that fits into normal planning cycles. Our main pain point was fragmented, inconsistent carbon data: different business units tracked activity in their own formats, emission factors were applied differently, and every reporting cycle felt like starting from scratch. The platform gave us a single system to capture activity data, apply standardized emission factors and methodologies, and roll everything up into scope 1, 2 and 3 views with recognized frameworks. The structure really paid off when client, auditors and leadership started asking more detailed questions; instead of manaully recreating calculations, we could trace each figure back to its underlying inputs, adjust an assumption once, and see the impact cascade through dashboards and reports.



