• HOME
  • CATEGORIES

    • CATEGORIES

    • Browse All Categories
  • FOR VENDORS

    • FOR VENDORS

    • Log In to Vendor Portal
    • Get Started
  • REVIEWS

    • REVIEWS

    • Write a Review
    • Product Reviews
    • Vendor Directory
    • Product Comparisons
  • GARTNER PEER COMMUNITY™
  • GARTNER.COM
  • Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQPrivacyTerms of Service
    ©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
    All rights reserved.
  • Categories

    • No categories available

      Browse All Categories

      Select a category to view markets

  • For Vendors

    • Log In to Vendor Portal 

    • Get Started 

  • Write a Review

Join / Sign In
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Mend
Logo of Mend

Mend

byMend.io
in
4.4
Market Presence: Software Supply Chain Security, Application Security Testing

Overview

Product Information on Mend

Updated 20th May 2026

What is Mend?

Modern risk doesn't live in one layer, it lives between them. Mend.io is built for every risk, across AI and AppSec, securing the code layer, the AI layer, and the interactions between them. From discovery and red teaming to guardrails and runtime protection, Mend.io delivers continuous protection across the AI application lifecycle. Mend AI secures the layer where modern risk actually lives, the interaction between code and AI. It continuously discovers AI components, tests real behavioral risk through automated red teaming, and enforces runtime guardrails for a continuous control system across the AI lifecycle. Mend AppSec secures the code layer by continuously discovering and prioritizing risk across code, libraries, containers, and dependencies, giving teams clarity to reduce exposure and ship secure software faster. Mend Renovate automatically updates dependencies, rating the likelihood each update will succeed and grouping by confidence level so teams can resolve them faster.

Mend Pricing

Mend.io enables developers and security professionals to write secure code and utilize secure components across every area of the SDLC. Pricing is based on the number of contributing developers and doesn't place limits on factors such as size of code or number of scans. A contributing developer is any employee or contractor who accesses Mend.io's web UI, or any engineer, developer, or other person who writes, develops, or modifies code being scanned or monitored by Mend.io.

Overall experience with Mend

IT Security & Risk Management Associate
1B - 3B USD, Software
FAVORABLE

“A Strong Partner in Application Security”

4.0
Feb 27, 2026
This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions.
APPSEC PROGRAMME MANAGER
3B - 10B USD, Software
CRITICAL

“Capable SCA platform, somewhat hampered by poor load visibility and inflexible migration path to later version”

3.0
Feb 25, 2026
This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions.

About Company

Company Description

Updated 2nd May 2024

Mend.io, previously known as WhiteSource, focusses on building high-grade Application Security (AppSec) programs which aim to mitigate risk while accelerating development. Leveraging cutting-edge automated technology, the company offers protection against threats associated with supply chains, malicious package attacks, and vulnerabilities found in both open source and custom code. Additionally, Mend.io addresses potential risks linked to open-source licenses. The firm is recognized for its record of satisfying complex, large-scale application security demands and is therefore chosen by numerous demanding development and security teams across the globe. Additionally, Mend.io administrates the automated dependency update project, Renovate.

Company Details

Updated 26th February 2025
Company type
Private
Year Founded
2011
Head office location
Boston, United States
Number of employees
201 - 500
Website
https://www.mend.io

Do You Manage Peer Insights at Mend.io?

Access Vendor Portal to update and manage your profile.

Key Insights

A Snapshot of What Matters - Based on Validated User Reviews

Top Mend Alternatives

Logo of Veracode
1. Veracode
4.5
(427 Ratings)
Logo of Checkmarx SAST
2. Checkmarx SAST
4.5
(401 Ratings)
Logo of Fluid Attacks
3. Fluid Attacks
4.8
(331 Ratings)
View All Alternatives

Peer Discussions

Mend Reviews and Ratings

4.4

(179 Ratings)

Rating Distribution

5 Star
41%
4 Star
53%
3 Star
6%
2 Star
1%
1 Star
0%
Why ratings and reviews count differ?
  • IT Security & Risk Management Associate
    1B-10B USD
    Software
    Review Source

    A Strong Partner in Application Security

    4.0
    Feb 27, 2026
    We have chosen to give a 4-star rating to Mend as it has become a foundational component of our AppSec Governance program. The platform is highly effective at "shifting left," allowing our multifarious teams to identify and remediate vulnerabilities in both open-source dependencies (SCA) and custom code (SAST) within the development lifecycle. We particularly value the reachability analysis, which helps us prioritize exploitable vulnerabilities and reduce developer fatigue. The primary reason for a 4-star rather than a 5-star rating is that we have encountered some scalability challenges owing to the sheer volume of projects and the complex nature of the environment of a global enterprise that grows through M&A. At our scale, we found that certain UI and reporting features required additional tuning to maintain performance. However, it is important to note that in every instance where we have faced such hurdles, the Mend team has been exceptionally quick to respond and remediate the issues. Their technical support and engineering teams have acted as true partners, working closely with us to optimize the platform for our specific needs. While we must emphasize that our use case is niche, the quality of their partnership and the effectiveness of their core security engine make them a top-tier choice for any serious AppSec initiative. We are confident that had we been completing this in 12-24 months time, 5-stars would be given.
  • IT Security & Risk Management Associate
    1B-10B USD
    Software
    Review Source

    A Strong Partner in Application Security

    4.0
    Feb 27, 2026
    We have chosen to give a 4-star rating to Mend as it has become a foundational component of our AppSec Governance program. The platform is highly effective at "shifting left," allowing our multifarious teams to identify and remediate vulnerabilities in both open-source dependencies (SCA) and custom code (SAST) within the development lifecycle. We particularly value the reachability analysis, which helps us prioritize exploitable vulnerabilities and reduce developer fatigue. The primary reason for a 4-star rather than a 5-star rating is that we have encountered some scalability challenges owing to the sheer volume of projects and the complex nature of the environment of a global enterprise that grows through M&A. At our scale, we found that certain UI and reporting features required additional tuning to maintain performance. However, it is important to note that in every instance where we have faced such hurdles, the Mend team has been exceptionally quick to respond and remediate the issues. Their technical support and engineering teams have acted as true partners, working closely with us to optimize the platform for our specific needs. While we must emphasize that our use case is niche, the quality of their partnership and the effectiveness of their core security engine make them a top-tier choice for any serious AppSec initiative. We are confident that had we been completing this in 12-24 months time, 5-stars would be given.
  • Read All 179 Reviews

    Get unlimited access to verified peer reviews and insights

    Read unlimited Gartner-vetted product reviews
    View and share valuable product insights
    Download full product profiles
    Review products you use today

Recommended Gartner Insights

  • Magic Quadrant for Software Supply Chain Security
Powered by Google TranslateThis service may contain translations provided by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement. Gartner's use of this provider is for operational purposes and does not constitute an endorsement of its products or services.

Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences, and should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in this content nor makes any warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this content, about its accuracy or completeness, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use apply.


Software reviews and ratings for EMMS, BI, CRM, MDM, analytics, security and other platforms - Peer Insights by Gartner
Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQsPrivacyTerms of Use

©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.

All rights reserved.

Reviewer Insights for: Mend
Performance of Mend Across Market Features

Mend Likes & Dislikes

Like

The things I like about the product are skewed by a security governance focus. I love that we now have that single pane of glass to verify our exposure to critical zero-day vulnerabilities. Before our Mend adoption this was a longer, more drawn out affair and we have significantly reduced our time to remediate as a result. The same applies to our production of SBOMs and compliance reports for security audits. In addition, we have reduced the time it takes to review and manage third-party licenses used in our products. Ultimately, Mend has provided a robust solutions that empowers our developers to manage vulnerabilities directly within their existing workflows/

Like

The things I like about the product are skewed by a security governance focus. I love that we now have that single pane of glass to verify our exposure to critical zero-day vulnerabilities. Before our Mend adoption this was a longer, more drawn out affair and we have significantly reduced our time to remediate as a result. The same applies to our production of SBOMs and compliance reports for security audits. In addition, we have reduced the time it takes to review and manage third-party licenses used in our products. Ultimately, Mend has provided a robust solutions that empowers our developers to manage vulnerabilities directly within their existing workflows/

Like

The things I like about the product are skewed by a security governance focus. I love that we now have that single pane of glass to verify our exposure to critical zero-day vulnerabilities. Before our Mend adoption this was a longer, more drawn out affair and we have significantly reduced our time to remediate as a result. The same applies to our production of SBOMs and compliance reports for security audits. In addition, we have reduced the time it takes to review and manage third-party licenses used in our products. Ultimately, Mend has provided a robust solutions that empowers our developers to manage vulnerabilities directly within their existing workflows/

Dislike

Lack of visibility of current scan queues/volumes No historic scan data (though this is being introduced slowly) Poor migration path to newer version (no side-by-side migration available)

Dislike

Lack of visibility of current scan queues/volumes No historic scan data (though this is being introduced slowly) Poor migration path to newer version (no side-by-side migration available)

Dislike

Lack of visibility of current scan queues/volumes No historic scan data (though this is being introduced slowly) Poor migration path to newer version (no side-by-side migration available)