• HOME
  • CATEGORIES

    • CATEGORIES

    • Browse All Categories
  • FOR VENDORS

    • FOR VENDORS

    • Log In to Vendor Portal
    • Get Started
  • REVIEWS

    • REVIEWS

    • Write a Review
    • Product Reviews
    • Vendor Directory
    • Product Comparisons
  • GARTNER PEER COMMUNITY™
  • GARTNER.COM
  • Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQPrivacyTerms of Service
    ©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
    All rights reserved.
  • Categories

    • No categories available

      Browse All Categories

      Select a category to view markets

  • For Vendors

    • Log In to Vendor Portal 

    • Get Started 

  • Write a Review

Join / Sign In

Overview

Product Information on Mend

Updated 13th October 2025

What is Mend?

The Mend AI Native AppSec Platform is designed to address risks in software created by both human developers and AI systems. The platform unifies static application security testing (SAST), software composition analysis (SCA), container scanning, AI component security and automated AI red teaming, giving teams visibility into risks across the application attack surface. The platform secures AI-generated code, embedded AI components (models, agents, MCPs, RAG pipelines), and conversational AI, while also covering traditional application risks. Mend.io integrates with development workflows to provide real-time alerts, policy enforcement, and ongoing monitoring across the software development lifecycle. Centralized dashboards and reporting deliver visibility into vulnerabilities, risk trends, and remediation progress. AI-assisted remediation and prioritization workflows enable teams to address issues efficiently and reduce overall risk.

Mend Pricing

Mend.io uses a subscription model priced by the number of contributing developers. Customers pay a single price that covers all product capabilities, including SCA, SAST, container security, and AI security, rather than licensing each product separately. Options for standalone purchase includes Mend Renovate Enterprise, which automates dependency updates.

Overall experience with Mend

IT Security & Risk Management Associate
1B - 3B USD, Software
FAVORABLE

“A Strong Partner in Application Security”

4.0
Feb 27, 2026
We have chosen to give a 4-star rating to Mend as it has become a foundational component of our AppSec Governance program. The platform is highly effective at "shifting left," allowing our multifarious teams to identify and remediate vulnerabilities in both open-source dependencies (SCA) and custom code (SAST) within the development lifecycle. We particularly value the reachability analysis, which helps us prioritize exploitable vulnerabilities and reduce developer fatigue. The primary reason for a 4-star rather than a 5-star rating is that we have encountered some scalability challenges owing to the sheer volume of projects and the complex nature of the environment of a global enterprise that grows through M&A. At our scale, we found that certain UI and reporting features required additional tuning to maintain performance. However, it is important to note that in every instance where we have faced such hurdles, the Mend team has been exceptionally quick to respond and remediate the issues. Their technical support and engineering teams have acted as true partners, working closely with us to optimize the platform for our specific needs. While we must emphasize that our use case is niche, the quality of their partnership and the effectiveness of their core security engine make them a top-tier choice for any serious AppSec initiative. We are confident that had we been completing this in 12-24 months time, 5-stars would be given.
APPSEC PROGRAMME MANAGER
3B - 10B USD, Software
CRITICAL

“Capable SCA platform, somewhat hampered by poor load visibility and inflexible migration path to later version”

3.0
Feb 25, 2026
The product is good - it generates no more false positives than other SCA tools, and is (relatively easy to work with). Our native integration with Azure DevOps is straightforward to manage. However, there are oversights including inability to exclude entire projects - only being able to exclude on a per-repo basis, lack of visibility of current scan queues and unhelpful logfiles which mean I regularly have to ask my developers (2500+) to raise support tickets as I don't have the empirical knowledge of each technology in use in our estate to troubleshoot effectively - the logs don't help in this regard.

Key Insights

A Snapshot of What Matters - Based on Validated User Reviews

Peer Discussions

Recommended Gartner Insights

  • Market Guide for Software Supply Chain Security

Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences, and should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in this content nor makes any warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this content, about its accuracy or completeness, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use apply.


Software reviews and ratings for EMMS, BI, CRM, MDM, analytics, security and other platforms - Peer Insights by Gartner
Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQsPrivacyTerms of Use

©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.

All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Mend
Logo of Mend

Mend

byMend.io
in
4.4
Market Presence: Software Supply Chain Security, Application Security Testing

About Company

Company Description

Updated 2nd May 2024

Mend.io, previously known as WhiteSource, focusses on building high-grade Application Security (AppSec) programs which aim to mitigate risk while accelerating development. Leveraging cutting-edge automated technology, the company offers protection against threats associated with supply chains, malicious package attacks, and vulnerabilities found in both open source and custom code. Additionally, Mend.io addresses potential risks linked to open-source licenses. The firm is recognized for its record of satisfying complex, large-scale application security demands and is therefore chosen by numerous demanding development and security teams across the globe. Additionally, Mend.io administrates the automated dependency update project, Renovate.

Company Details

Updated 26th February 2025
Company type
Private
Year Founded
2011
Head office location
Boston, United States
Number of employees
201 - 500
Website
https://www.mend.io

Do You Manage Peer Insights at Mend.io?

Access Vendor Portal to update and manage your profile.

Reviewer Insights for: Mend
Performance of Mend Across Market Features

Mend Likes & Dislikes

Like

The things I like about the product are skewed by a security governance focus. I love that we now have that single pane of glass to verify our exposure to critical zero-day vulnerabilities. Before our Mend adoption this was a longer, more drawn out affair and we have significantly reduced our time to remediate as a result. The same applies to our production of SBOMs and compliance reports for security audits. In addition, we have reduced the time it takes to review and manage third-party licenses used in our products. Ultimately, Mend has provided a robust solutions that empowers our developers to manage vulnerabilities directly within their existing workflows/

Like

It's straightforward to use Integrates with our ASPM platform seamlessly False Positive rate is on par with similar solutions

Like

I like the most: -very good support -Mend always taking in consideration to improve the product -dedicated person responsible for our company. Toni is always helping us

Dislike

Scalability as previously mentioned

Dislike

Lack of visibility of current scan queues/volumes No historic scan data (though this is being introduced slowly) Poor migration path to newer version (no side-by-side migration available)

Dislike

-Feature implementation taking sometimes too long -Technical trainings regarding AI side- we need more -The fact that each time we create a new scan will create a new project. The default behavior should be to be able to create multiple scans in the same project

Top Mend Alternatives

Logo of Veracode
1. Veracode
4.6
(419 Ratings)
Logo of Checkmarx SAST
2. Checkmarx SAST
4.6
(400 Ratings)
Logo of Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking
3. Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking
4.8
(274 Ratings)
View All Alternatives

Mend Reviews and Ratings

4.4

(179 Ratings)

Rating Distribution

5 Star
41%
4 Star
53%
3 Star
6%
2 Star
1%
1 Star
0%
Why ratings and reviews count differ?

Customer Experience

Evaluation & Contracting

4.5

Integration & Deployment

4.4

Service & Support

4.6

Product Capabilities

4.2

Filter Reviews
Sort By:
Most helpful
Last 12 Months
Star Rating
Reviewer Type
Reviewer's Company Size
Reviewer's Industry
Reviewer's Region
Reviewer's Job Function
  • IT Security & Risk Management Associate
    1B-10B USD
    Software
    Review Source

    A Strong Partner in Application Security

    4.0
    Feb 27, 2026
    We have chosen to give a 4-star rating to Mend as it has become a foundational component of our AppSec Governance program. The platform is highly effective at "shifting left," allowing our multifarious teams to identify and remediate vulnerabilities in both open-source dependencies (SCA) and custom code (SAST) within the development lifecycle. We particularly value the reachability analysis, which helps us prioritize exploitable vulnerabilities and reduce developer fatigue. The primary reason for a 4-star rather than a 5-star rating is that we have encountered some scalability challenges owing to the sheer volume of projects and the complex nature of the environment of a global enterprise that grows through M&A. At our scale, we found that certain UI and reporting features required additional tuning to maintain performance. However, it is important to note that in every instance where we have faced such hurdles, the Mend team has been exceptionally quick to respond and remediate the issues. Their technical support and engineering teams have acted as true partners, working closely with us to optimize the platform for our specific needs. While we must emphasize that our use case is niche, the quality of their partnership and the effectiveness of their core security engine make them a top-tier choice for any serious AppSec initiative. We are confident that had we been completing this in 12-24 months time, 5-stars would be given.
  • APPSEC PROGRAMME MANAGER
    1B-10B USD
    Software
    Review Source

    Capable SCA platform, somewhat hampered by poor load visibility and inflexible migration path to later version

    3.0
    Feb 25, 2026
    The product is good - it generates no more false positives than other SCA tools, and is (relatively easy to work with). Our native integration with Azure DevOps is straightforward to manage. However, there are oversights including inability to exclude entire projects - only being able to exclude on a per-repo basis, lack of visibility of current scan queues and unhelpful logfiles which mean I regularly have to ask my developers (2500+) to raise support tickets as I don't have the empirical knowledge of each technology in use in our estate to troubleshoot effectively - the logs don't help in this regard.
  • It Security & Risk Management Associate
    50M-1B USD
    Banking
    Review Source

    Mend Platform Offers Broad Coverage but Faces Documentation and Support Issues

    3.0
    Feb 25, 2026
    Mend provides a mature platform with extensive coverage across SCA, SAST and container security which has helped improve visibility across our software supply chain. However, customer communication and out-of-date documentation has been a challenge.
  • It Security & Risk Management Associate
    50M-1B USD
    Banking
    Review Source

    Vulnerability Analysis Effective But Initial Setup Support Remains a Challenge

    3.0
    Feb 25, 2026
    Mend provides strong vulnerability analysis and scanning capabilities in the context of SCA. However, the Vendor's lack of support during the initial on-boarding and deployment of the tool made the project difficult at the outset.
  • ALM Tools Engineer
    10B+ USD
    Consumer Goods
    Review Source

    Very good support from your team, but sometimes the product team can implement the new features faster. You can also improve the AI training side so we can use it better.

    5.0
    Mar 20, 2026
    Mend has been an outstanding partner, delivering a reliable and efficient solution with excellent support. Your team is responsive, knowledgeable and consistently committed to improving the product and customer experience.
...
Showing Result 1-5 of 179