Overview
Product Information on Amazon Q Developer
What is Amazon Q Developer?
Amazon Q Developer Pricing
Overall experience with Amazon Q Developer
“Trust in Tool Output Grows Despite Early Context and Auto Mode Reliability Problems”
“Amazon Q Delivers Superior Latency but Falls Short in Code Completion Tasks”
About Company
Company Description
Amazon Web Services (AWS), established in 2006, is focused on providing essential infrastructure services to businesses globally in the form of cloud computing. The key advantage offered through cloud computing, particularly via AWS, is its capacity to shift fixed infrastructure expenses into flexible costs. Businesses have been able to forgo extensive planning and procurement of servers and other Information Technology (IT) resources, owing to AWS. AWS seeks to provide businesses with prompt and cost-effective access to resources using Amazon's expertise and economies of scale, as and when their business requires. Currently, AWS offers a robust, scalable, economic infrastructure platform on the cloud powering an extensive array of businesses worldwide. It operates across numerous industries with data center locations in various parts of the globe including U.S., Europe, Singapore, and Japan.
Company Details
Do You Manage Peer Insights at Amazon Web Services (AWS)?
Access Vendor Portal to update and manage your profile.
Key Insights
A Snapshot of What Matters - Based on Validated User Reviews
User Sentiment About Amazon Q Developer
Reviewer Insights for: Amazon Q Developer
Deciding Factors: Amazon Q Developer Vs. Market Average
Amazon Q Developer Likes & Dislikes
1. Speeds up repetitive and low value tasks with precision 2. Acts like a smart assistant and is not just a code generator, in a few cases observed proactive approach which was surpassingly good. 3. Easy to use
Its strong focus on data security, backed by Amazon's Ring 1 certification. This provides high level of trust and assurance especially while handling sensitive and regulated (PII ) data.
It is extremely knowledgeable about the inner workings of AWS services, but it tailored its responses related to each based on my knowledge level of each, able to do deeper dives into the services that i was more familiar with while starting high level in ones that i described myself as being less familiar with.
1. Initial setup and context building was tricky and with a lot of bugs, but improved with time. 2. Auto mode results were less reliable, so used claude sonnet specifically for better results. 3. UI rendering issue seen with Camunda workflows, was repetitively corrected via prompts and then its fine now.
The user interface is not very intuitive, which affects the overall user experience and ease of navigation.
nothing comes to mind from my recent experience
Top Amazon Q Developer Alternatives
Peer Discussions
Amazon Q Developer Reviews and Ratings
- Technical Lead10B+ USDTelecommunicationReview Source
Trust in Tool Output Grows Despite Early Context and Auto Mode Reliability Problems
Overall my experience has been positive and good. Specially in non productive or non functional tasks like comparisons, documentation it has helped massively and even in productive tasks for my specific use case (Camunda workflow development) I have seen a 20% improvement so far. A lot of manual effort was saved recently for unification of multiple complicated flows into 1 related to comparisons, input/output variables normalization task. That being said, there is a lot of learning curve at the beginning. Making it understand the Camunda flow context and also requirements was a challenge and I faced issues with UI rendering of created Camunda flows in Camunda modeler tool very frequently. I had to provide specific instructions to correct those for every task. Since we are new users of this tool, it takes a while to trust the output as well but I have reached a more trusting phase now. Overall, it's a solid tool. Will definitely improve overall output however with specific products and context it won't replace developers fully as being projected, it will still remain a good assistant. - Director of Data and Analytics50M-1B USDSoftwareReview Source
Evaluation Shows Q Developer Adjusts Technical Depth According To User Familiarity
I tried Q Developer when it first came out, and it was not as effective as some of the other code generators on the market at the time. i tried it again recently and it blew me away. I used it to help on a project that our team was blocked on with some complex technical issues related to a variety of AWS services, and it talked through every stage of debugging, and was extremely concise and hnderatandable, and knowledgeable about the inner workings of services that i hadnt previously used. - Engineer50M-1B USDMiscellaneousReview Source
Q developer is a great developer assistant tool
it works well. glad for visual studio plugin. i do wish it would remember history after closing the ide and workspace. it would help when i have to reboot my machine. - IT AssociateGov't/PS/EdEducationReview Source
Q is the IT coworker I never knew I needed
Since discovering Q Developer and incorporating it into my workflow, I've not only significantly increased my velocity and output as an architect, but I've been able to redefine my role as a worker that can leverage AI as a partner, sounding board, tutor, and all around key to improving my performance and staying relevant in the modern IT workforce. - SR. SOLUTIONS ARCHITECT1B-10B USDManufacturingReview Source
Amazon Q Developer: A quick action driven code assistant for modern SDLC
Its very positive. It feels mature, fast and purpose- built for real world development activities. It integrate smoothly into the exixting IDE "VS Code" and significantly reduces repetitive tasks as well as exploration. it excels at interpretting project structure, summarizing complex code bases and generating reliable upgrades. Helping the team to delivery higher quality code with minimal bugs