• HOME
  • CATEGORIES

    • CATEGORIES

    • Browse All Categories
  • FOR VENDORS

    • FOR VENDORS

    • Log In to Vendor Portal
    • Get Started
  • REVIEWS

    • REVIEWS

    • Write a Review
    • Product Reviews
    • Vendor Directory
    • Product Comparisons
  • GARTNER PEER COMMUNITY™
  • GARTNER.COM
  • Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQPrivacyTerms of Service
    ©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
    All rights reserved.
  • Categories

    • Loading categories...

      Browse All Categories

      Loading markets...

  • For Vendors

    • Log In to Vendor Portal 

    • Get Started 

  • Write a Review

Join / Sign In
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Amazon Q Developer
  4. /
  5. Alternatives
Logo of Amazon Q Developer

Amazon Q Developer Alternatives

4.4(415 Ratings)

Considering alternatives to Amazon Q Developer? See what this market Amazon Q Developer users also considered in their purchasing decision. When evaluating different solutions, potential buyers compare competencies in categories such as evaluation and contracting, integration and deployment, service and support, and specific product capabilities.

Check out real reviews verified by Gartner to see how Amazon Q Developer compares to its competitors and find the best software or service for your organization.

Reviewed in Last 12 Months
How Alternatives Are Selected
Logo of GitHub Copilot
1. GitHub Copilot

By GitHub

4.4
(274 Ratings)
Using GitHub Copilot has become a daily habit for my Selenium/java work. It's not just a fancy autocomplete anymore, the recent updates in have turned it into a proper coding partner. Having our automated test framework on GitHub makes the integration seamless. I use it mostly for boilerplate code, like generating those repetitive page object methods or writing snippets for our api tests. It's incredibly fast at picking up the patterns in the codebase, so it knows exactly how to name the variables and structure the tests without me having to explain it every time. The Copilot agent integration is the real game changer here. Unlike the standard suggestions, the agent can now look at my entire workspace and handle more complex tasks like refactoring an entire test suite or fixing a tricky race condition in our selenium scripts. I can just @workspace in the chat and ask it to find all tests that don't have proper teardown logic and it highlights them and offers a fix in seconds. It's also great for generating documentation for our test cases, which is something I used to spend way too much time on. I use copilot when I want to stay in the flow and write the code myself but with a lot of help. I use it for quick fixes and real-time suggestions, whereas I send the bigger, more time-consuming tasks over to other AI tools that I also use along with Copilot. Together, they make a powerful team. Copilot helps me with the logic and small details, and the other one handles the heavy lifting of building entire scenarios from scratch. It still has those moments where it suggests code that looks right but is actually slightly outdated it doesn't perfectly match our custom framework wrappers. Also, if I am working on a very large file, it can sometimes lose the context of what I was doing three hundred lines up. And just like with other tools, there's always that slight concern about it being a bit hallucinatory with library versions if it has not seen the latest updates yet. But honestly, for the speed and accuracy it provides in my daily Java development, it's hard to imagine going back to coding without it.Read all insights and reviews for GitHub Copilot

Where Amazon Q Developer Scored Higher

  • Better evaluation and contracting
Compare with Amazon Q Developer
Logo of Gemini Code Assist
2. Gemini Code Assist

By Google

4.4
(252 Ratings)
my overall experience with Gemini has been positive so far, especially for tasks involving real-time info and integration with Google's vast ecosystem. Its handling capacity of multiple inputs is cool and the speed of retrieving data and processing it is exceptional. However, I noticed that it sometimes lacks the depth and nuance found in other models during the creation of complex creative and reasoning tasks. There is a whole lot of scope to improve its efficacy. Read all insights and reviews for Gemini Code Assist
Compare with Amazon Q Developer
Logo of Cursor
3. Cursor

By Anysphere

4.5
(78 Ratings)
My overall experience with Cursor has been quite positive. As a new user, I found the setup and integration process to be straightforward, allowing me to quickly connect Cursor to my existing workflows. It's a powerful tool that simplifies running code to automate various steps, which is particularly beneficial in my role within the tech sector. I can have multiple sources feed into it directly, which adds a wealth of context to the discussion.Read all insights and reviews for Cursor

Where Amazon Q Developer Scored Higher

  • Better at service and support
  • Better evaluation and contracting
Compare with Amazon Q Developer
Logo of Windsurf
4. Windsurf

By Windsurf

4.5
(73 Ratings)
Overall experience has been great, have been using Windsurf for a couple of months now. The efficiency has increased tremendously after introducing it. There's still some room for refinement but worth 4 stars.Read all insights and reviews for Windsurf
Compare with Amazon Q Developer
Logo of Claude
5. Claude

By Anthropic

4.7
(48 Ratings)
I am using Claude Sonnet 4.5 to perform code reviews as well as a tool to perform hands-on analysis of running systems, which gives me a far better position to manage multiple devops teams. I also use Claude to set up demos and learn about new concepts, which provides me a far better learning experience working hands-on with a system.Read all insights and reviews for Claude

Where Amazon Q Developer Scored Higher

  • Better evaluation and contracting
Compare with Amazon Q Developer
Logo of Augment Code
6. Augment Code

By Augment Code

4.8
(40 Ratings)
Excellent AI coding assistant that boosts developer productivity wit accurate, context aware code suggestions.Read all insights and reviews for Augment Code
Compare with Amazon Q Developer
Logo of Qodo
7. Qodo

By Qodo

4.5
(33 Ratings)
It is an amazing tool, easily gets integrated to IDE and works fine for most of the cases, however there is need of improvement for Agentic mode.Read all insights and reviews for Qodo

Where Amazon Q Developer Scored Higher

  • Better evaluation and contracting
Compare with Amazon Q Developer
Logo of Replit
8. Replit

By Replit

4.5
(26 Ratings)
Replit is a great platform for developing, I been using it for a while now, since TypeScript appeared and honestly I love how convenient and accessible it makes coding, even the little features, it's just great on how it does things right, than the coding assistant comes and really makes the process of writing code to be more fun and enjoyable, you get suggestions about things you should and shouldn't do.Read all insights and reviews for Replit

Where Amazon Q Developer Scored Higher

  • Better at service and support
Compare with Amazon Q Developer
Showing Result 1-8 of 23

Top Alternatives to Amazon Q Developer

  • GitHub Copilot
  • Gemini Code Assist
  • Cursor
  • Windsurf
  • Claude
  • Augment Code
  • Qodo
  • Replit

Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences, and should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in this content nor makes any warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this content, about its accuracy or completeness, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use apply.


Software reviews and ratings for EMMS, BI, CRM, MDM, analytics, security and other platforms - Peer Insights by Gartner
Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQsPrivacyTerms of Use

©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.

All rights reserved.