Amazon Q Developer Alternatives

4.4(114 Ratings)

Considering alternatives to Amazon Q Developer? See what this market Amazon Q Developer users also considered in their purchasing decision. When evaluating different solutions, potential buyers compare competencies in categories such as evaluation and contracting, integration and deployment, service and support, and specific product capabilities.

Check out real reviews verified by Gartner to see how Amazon Q Developer compares to its competitors and find the best software or service for your organization.

Reviewed in Last 12 Months

How Alternatives Are Selected

1. Gemini

4.5

my overall experience with Gemini has been positive so far, especially for tasks involving real-time info and integration with Google's vast ecosystem. Its handling capacity of multiple inputs is cool and the speed of retrieving data and processing it is exceptional. However, I noticed that it sometimes lacks the depth and nuance found in other models during the creation of complex creative and reasoning tasks. There is a whole lot of scope to improve its efficacy. Read all insights and reviews for Gemini

Compare with Amazon Q Developer

Add to Compare

2. GitHub Copilot

4.4

Github Copilot can make some tedious work faster, such as writing repetitive variables, inferring simple continuations of what you are writing, but it has its issues. It will be inconsistent when offering help some time refusing to do some actions, and then doing them if you keep asking for help with the same prompt. The auto-write feature can also be very intrusive, to the point where a lot of people in my company found more usefulness in turning it off entirely. Also, at the time of this review, sometimes it can get in the way of the compiler being set up with certain integrations as an extension, and the only way to bring up said compilers is to disable, restart, and then enable copilot again. Read all insights and reviews for GitHub Copilot

Where Amazon Q Developer Scored Higher

Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with Amazon Q Developer

Add to Compare

3. Windsurf

4.5

My overall experience with Windsurf has been outstanding. It significantly boosted my productivity and simplified my workflow. I no longer have to juggle multiple extensions or constantly switch to external tools . Everything is built-in, intuitive, and fast. The support team was also incredibly helpful and generous when I faced an issue during the trial period. That level of customer care really stood out to me.Read all insights and reviews for Windsurf

Where Amazon Q Developer Scored Higher

Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with Amazon Q Developer

Add to Compare

4. Cursor

4.4

Cursor experience has been amazing AI Vibe coding editor that we have onboarded in our company more than 6 months ago. Being the first AI-native IDEs, it is way ahead in bringing new features and the UX, code suggestions and agent works way better than others. The recent multi-agent interface is just amazing; allowing our devs to use multiple agents in parallel and then pick the best solution. Sandbox terminal is also quite handy in saving time in writing and running commands manually. Our front-end developers are loving the browser integration. for debugging.Read all insights and reviews for Cursor

Where Amazon Q Developer Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with Amazon Q Developer

Add to Compare

5. Augment Code

By Augment Code

4.8

Our experience with Augment has been excellent and have been using it for over 6 months with about 70 users. We transitioned from a competitor product after using it for a year. We found Augment to have better context awareness for our existing large code base with more accurate and relevant autocomplete and chat, with lower latency, and had great IDE support. Beyond the engineers, we love the Slack bot which has been a game changer. This allows product managers and customer facing teams to self-serve technical information and product behavior questions without escalating to engineering. This lowers our overhead and gets answers to customers faster. The chatbot is also handy for doing technical planning, generating requirements docuemnts, technical plans, etc. We also like the high-touch support with a shared slack channel and regular detailed usage and adoption reports. Read all insights and reviews for Augment Code

Compare with Amazon Q Developer

Add to Compare

6. Qodo Gen

4.5

It is an amazing tool, easily gets integrated to IDE and works fine for most of the cases, however there is need of improvement for Agentic mode.Read all insights and reviews for Qodo Gen

Where Amazon Q Developer Scored Higher

Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with Amazon Q Developer

Add to Compare

7. GitLab Duo

4.3

My overall experience was good, I got the help I needed and the process was clear I didn't face any major issues, its a perfect platform for beginners Read all insights and reviews for GitLab Duo

Where Amazon Q Developer Scored Higher

Better at service and support

Compare with Amazon Q Developer

Add to Compare

8. JetBrains AI Assistant

4.2

Both the AI Assistant and Junie generally work well - when provided with appropriate instructions. I tend to use it for short tasks that take 3-5 minutes of agent time, which would have taken me 30-40 minutes of work. Great for going through lots of documents (like SQL files) to come up with code that works reasonably well.Read all insights and reviews for JetBrains AI Assistant

Where Amazon Q Developer Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with Amazon Q Developer

Add to Compare

Showing Result 1-8 of 20