Overview
Overall experience with GE PowerOn ADMS
Group Manager Network Operations
Gov't/PS/ED <5,000 Employees, Energy and UtilitiesFAVORABLE
Relationship with GE has matured as our understanding and expertise with the product has matured. We have been tenacious in driving GE to optimise the outcomes from the product development both directly with GE and through our chairmanship of the PowerOn user group. GE have responded accordingly. We have seen stronger commitment to customer service from GE since the merger with Alstom.
SENIOR CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYST
10B - 30B USD, Energy and UtilitiesCRITICAL
“Product Offers Consistent Performance but Limited by Magik Language Expertise”
No frills product that was a solid performer, it just worked for the most part.
About Company
Key Insights
A Snapshot of What Matters - Based on Validated User Reviews
Reviewer Insights for: GE PowerOn ADMS
Performance of GE PowerOn ADMS Across Market Features
GE PowerOn ADMS Likes & Dislikes
The product is evergreen and constantly improving with seamless annual upgrades to the latest software version at no additional cost. Historically we would have to pay for upgrades with other suppliers at significant cost. Another feature is the ability to adapt the product through highly flexible end user configuration to meet our business requirements/processes.
It was extremely reliable
The product seems to be highly configurable.
Cost of customer initiated changes to the software. Also, lack of commitment to NPI (Net Product Improvement) in addressing the top 5 issues/improvements identified through the Australian and NZ user forum.
Magik is not a well-known language so expertise can be hard to find.
The product needs more polishing
Top GE PowerOn ADMS Alternatives
Peer Discussions
GE PowerOn ADMS Reviews and Ratings
Filter Reviews
Sort By:
Most helpful
Last 12 Months
Star Rating
Reviewer Type
Reviewer's Company Size
Reviewer's Industry
Reviewer's Region
Reviewer's Job Function
- SENIOR CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYST10B+ USDEnergy and UtilitiesReview Source
Product Offers Consistent Performance but Limited by Magik Language Expertise
No frills product that was a solid performer, it just worked for the most part. - Group Manager Network OperationsGov't/PS/EdEnergy and UtilitiesReview Source
Not a simple implementation due to highly integrated systems but outcome has been worth it
Relationship with GE has matured as our understanding and expertise with the product has matured. We have been tenacious in driving GE to optimise the outcomes from the product development both directly with GE and through our chairmanship of the PowerOn user group. GE have responded accordingly. We have seen stronger commitment to customer service from GE since the merger with Alstom. - Sr. Engineer1B-10B USDEnergy and UtilitiesReview Source
Implementation of our pilot ADMS has taught us that we need to prepare more for a full im
Our implementation of an ADMS is on pilot project basis and our RFP agreement with vendor was to work as partners but sometimes we feel that the vendor forgot about the partnership part of our agreement. - Electrical Engineer - SCADA Systems50M-1B USDEnergy and UtilitiesReview Source
Implementation was ok, but there have been some disappointments
We are satisfied with most of the product, but there are some items we are not so satisfied with. - Head of Network Operations10B+ USDEnergy and UtilitiesReview Source
Change the process not the system. More features than we could adopt.
Solid inhouse matter experience and a clear set of business requirements. Worked with the vendor on agreeing and delivering the requirments.
Showing Result 1-5 of 7



