AWS CodeCommit Alternatives

4.0(13 Ratings)

Code Review Tools

Considering alternatives to AWS CodeCommit? See what this market AWS CodeCommit users also considered in their purchasing decision. When evaluating different solutions, potential buyers compare competencies in categories such as evaluation and contracting, integration and deployment, service and support, and specific product capabilities.

Check out real reviews verified by Gartner to see how AWS CodeCommit compares to its competitors and find the best software or service for your organization.

Reviewed in Last 12 Months

How Alternatives Are Selected

1. GitHub

4.6

My overall experience with GitHub has been very highly positive and impactful for team and individual collaboration. It provides a well structured platform for version control that makes tracking changes, maintaining codebases, repos and history. GitHub plays a huge role in contributing to various projects as a team, pull requests and code reviews are one of the greatest features in GitHub while contributing as a team encourages better code quality and collaboration. It also has built in tools like project boards and issues in repos to keep track of any issues or bugs. It also has integrations with CI/CD pipelines, cloud services and 3rd party services. Overall, it helps in testing, deployments and checks. There are also security features such as vulnerability alerts and branch protection which are significant when working on production repos. Read all insights and reviews for GitHub

Where AWS CodeCommit Scored Higher

Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with AWS CodeCommit

Add to Compare

2. GitLab

4.5

I am a user of Git-Lab as both a code repository and code reviewing tool to streamline the development lifecycle and maintain high code quality. As a Git-based platform, Git-lab provides robust version control capabilities, enabling me to manage branches, track commit history and collaborate with team members in a structured way. I use it to host and organize my source code repositories, ensuring centralized and secure access to the code-base. For code reviews, GitLab’s Merge Request system is highly effective-it allows for inline commenting on change comparisons, threaded discussions, and enforcement of approval rules before changes are merged into the main branch. In addition, GitLab integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, so every merge request can trigger automated testing, linting and deployment processes, ensuring that only validated and tested code makes it into production.It also supports code quality and security via secure scanning to detect vulnerabilities in the early development phase.Read all insights and reviews for GitLab

Compare with AWS CodeCommit

Add to Compare

3. Azure DevOps

4.3

Overall, my experience with azure devOps has been very positive. It provides a unified platform for planning, development ci/cd and monitoring, which has significantly improved collaboration between development and operations teams. Azure boards and pipelines work reliably and integrate well with other Microsoft and third-party tools. However, the initial setup and permission management can feel complex for the new users and some advanced features have a learning curve. Once configured properly, it becomes a stable and scalable solution for managing end to end application lifecycles.Read all insights and reviews for Azure DevOps

Where AWS CodeCommit Scored Higher

Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with AWS CodeCommit

Add to Compare

4. Bitbucket

4.5

Our overall experience with Bitbucket has been positive. It has been a stable and dependable platform for managing source code and collaborating across development teams. The integration with other Atlassian tools, especially Jira, helps streamline workflows and maintain better visibility between code changes and project tracking. The pull request and code review process us straightforward and works well for enforcing development standards. Access control and branch permissions provide good governance, which is important for enterprise environments. While the core features are solid, there are occasional issues with larger repositories and some advanced CI/CD use cases require additional configuration. Despite these limitations, Bitbucket meets our day-to-day development needs and continues to be a reliable solution overall. Read all insights and reviews for Bitbucket

Where AWS CodeCommit Scored Higher

Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with AWS CodeCommit

Add to Compare

5. CodeRabbit

4.2

CodeRabbit has been a lifesaver for people like me who are reviewing a bunch of code requests daily. It acts as a bridge between the coder and reviewer, catching code issues before hand and making sure the code is clean, reliable and ready to ship.Read all insights and reviews for CodeRabbit

Where AWS CodeCommit Scored Higher

Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with AWS CodeCommit

Add to Compare

6. CodeAnt AI Reviews

4.7

CodeAnt AI is an AI powered code health platform designed to automate and improve the development lifecycle, focusing on code reviews, quality and security.Read all insights and reviews for CodeAnt AI Reviews

Compare with AWS CodeCommit

Add to Compare

7. CodeScene

5

Codescene is a rare gem as it focuses on a concept known as behavioural analysis and this sets is apart in terms of value of time and resource needed to make an impact on the product teams software.Read all insights and reviews for CodeScene

Where AWS CodeCommit Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy

Compare with AWS CodeCommit

Add to Compare

8. Crucible (Legacy)

5

Atlassian product is always good and keep improving. Great for a start up to scale from.Read all insights and reviews for Crucible (Legacy)

Compare with AWS CodeCommit

Add to Compare

Showing Result 1-8 of 12