• HOME
  • CATEGORIES

    • CATEGORIES

    • Browse All Categories
  • FOR VENDORS

    • FOR VENDORS

    • Log In to Vendor Portal
    • Get Started
  • REVIEWS

    • REVIEWS

    • Write a Review
    • Product Reviews
    • Vendor Directory
    • Product Comparisons
  • GARTNER PEER COMMUNITY™
  • GARTNER.COM
  • Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQPrivacyTerms of Service
    ©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
    All rights reserved.
  • Categories

    • No categories available

      Browse All Categories

      Select a category to view markets

  • For Vendors

    • Log In to Vendor Portal 

    • Get Started 

  • Write a Review

Join / Sign In
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. GitHub
Logo of GitHub

GitHub

byGitHub
in
4.6
2026
Market Presence: DevOps Platforms (Transitioning to DevSecOps Platforms), Code Review Tools

Overview

Product Information on GitHub

Updated 5th July 2023

What is GitHub?

GitHub Enterprise is a DevOps platform to build, scale and deliver secure software that includes: - GitHub Repositories and Discussions for collaboration - GitHub Issues & Projects for project planning - GitHub Actions for software workflow automation and CI/CD - GitHub Packages for software package hosting - Security Overview for a centralized view of your organization's security risks - Dependabot alerts for any new vulnerabilities affecting dependencies in your repos - Dependabot security updates that automatically open pull requests to update vulnerable dependencies to secure versions - Dependabot version updates that automatically open pull requests to update out-of-date dependencies - GitHub Security Advisories to privately discuss, fix and publish information about security vulnerabilities found in a repo - Enterprise Managed Users for centralized user account administration Add-ons to GitHub Enterprise include GitHub Copilot, GitHub Advanced Security and GitHub Codespaces.

GitHub Pricing

GitHub Enterprise is $21 per user per month.

GitHub Product Images

GitHub Enterprise demo
GitHub Enterprise demo

Overall experience with GitHub

Software Engineer
250M - 500M USD, Software
FAVORABLE

“Collaborative Code Reviews and Self-Healing Tests Improve Code Framework Efficiency”

4.0
Jan 24, 2026
This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions.
Director, It Security And Risk Managemen
500M - 1B USD, Real Estate
CRITICAL

“Security Dashboard Limitations and Support Gaps Impact Usability for Organizations”

3.0
Apr 13, 2026
This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions.

Badges

Gartner Peer Insights recognizes vendors who meet or exceed both the market average Overall Experience and the market average User Interest and Adoption score through a Customers’ Choice distinction.
2026
For Market:
DevOps Platforms (Transitioning to DevSecOps Platforms)

About Company

Company Description

Updated 14th January 2025

GitHub is a platform where developers, businesses, and organizations collaborate to create and innovate. Offering tools for version control, CI/CD, security, and code review, GitHub helps teams build software efficiently and securely. With GitHub Copilot, developers can leverage AI to receive real-time coding assistance, streamlining their workflows and enabling them to focus on solving complex challenges. The platform supports a wide range of projects, from open source to enterprise, while integrating seamlessly into development processes to foster collaboration and security. As part of Microsoft, GitHub is committed to empowering developers and organizations to bring their ideas to life, working toward the goal of supporting 1 billion developers worldwide.

Company Details

Updated 26th February 2025
Company type
Public
Year Founded
2008
Head office location
San Francisco, United States
Number of employees
2500 - 4999
Parent Company
Microsoft
Annual Revenue
1B-3B USD
Website
https://github.com

Do You Manage Peer Insights at GitHub?

Access Vendor Portal to update and manage your profile.

Key Insights

A Snapshot of What Matters - Based on Validated User Reviews

Top GitHub Alternatives

Logo of GitLab
1. GitLab
4.4
(850 Ratings)
Logo of Bitbucket
2. Bitbucket
4.5
(572 Ratings)
Logo of Veracode
3. Veracode
4.5
(427 Ratings)
View All Alternatives

Peer Discussions

What Your Peers Are Saying About GitHub

VP of Product Management
Based on many peer discussions, seemed like GitHub Co-pilot was really the only true AI product teams were using internally. Any other tools people are finding value with on internal side?
Senior Vice President, Engineering
Other than GitHub Copilot, we have seen developers using Tabnine and Codeium very often with a lot of success. If you are an IntelliJ fan, do check out their custom AI available in their tools like Rover and Fleet.  ChatGPT has been a revolution and probably is as good as any other option available today. Feel free to checkout these tools though.
See Full Discussion
16 Nov 20234.4k Views8 Comments
IT Manager
Has anyone had any success with evaluating the impact of using Generative AI tools such as GitHub's Copilot on the productivity or performance impact on developers? I see a lot of qualitative discussions about how developers say they are more productive, but how are you measuring that impact?
Group Chief AI Officer & Partner
Here is a link to a study where they recruited 95 professional developers, split them randomly into two groups, and timed how long it took them to write an HTTP server in JavaScript. Research: quantifying GitHub Copilot’s impact on developer productivity and happiness - The GitHub Blog Result:  The group that used GitHub Copilot had a higher rate of completing the task (78%, compared to 70% in the group without Copilot). The striking difference was that developers who used GitHub Copilot completed the task significantly faster–55% faster than the developers who didn’t use GitHub Copilot. Specifically, the developers using GitHub Copilot took on average 1 hour and 11 minutes to complete the task, while the developers who didn’t use GitHub Copilot took on average 2 hours and 41 minutes. These results are statistically significant (P=.0017) and the 95% confidence interval for the percentage speed gain is [21%, 89%].
See Full Discussion
11 Jul 202543.7k Views16 Comments

GitHub Reviews and Ratings

4.6

(817 Ratings)

Rating Distribution

5 Star
57%
4 Star
41%
3 Star
2%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%
Why ratings and reviews count differ?
  • Software Engineer
    50M-1B USD
    Software
    Review Source

    Collaborative Code Reviews and Self-Healing Tests Improve Code Framework Efficiency

    4.0
    Jan 24, 2026
    Honestly, switching our main automation test framework over to GitHub has been a total game changer for my team. I've used a lot of older tools in the past, but nothing matches the reliability and convenience GitHub offers. Sorting all our Java and Selenium test code in one spot means everyone's on the same page and collaboration just happens more smoothly. I'm a big fan of pull requests too, it really streamlines code reviews for our scripts, making it so simple to track feedback and improvements. Plus. Having a clear, well-organized history of every single change brings real peace of mind. If anything ever goes sideways, it is so easy to revert back to a version that we know works. And then there is the Agent, this is not the basic auto complete tool from a year ago. Now, I just ask it to handle tasks like refactoring page objects or generating new test suites for specific cases, and it coordinates updates across various files. When running in agent mode, it even takes things a step further by executing the tests in the terminal. And if something fails, it tries to troubleshoot and sort it out on its own until everything passes. That level of self-healing really does feel like having an extra set of hands on the team If I'm dealing with a flaky test or a weird timeout in my REST Assured code, I just tag the agent. It digs into the logs to find out what went wrong and actually points out possible fixes. There was even a time last month when it noticed a race condition in our framework that I'd probably have spent hours, maybe even a whole day trying to isolate on my own. The amount of time it saves me, both in writing and debugging scripts, has made this the MVP in our current toolset.
  • Software Engineer
    50M-1B USD
    Software
    Review Source

    Collaborative Code Reviews and Self-Healing Tests Improve Code Framework Efficiency

    4.0
    Jan 24, 2026
    Honestly, switching our main automation test framework over to GitHub has been a total game changer for my team. I've used a lot of older tools in the past, but nothing matches the reliability and convenience GitHub offers. Sorting all our Java and Selenium test code in one spot means everyone's on the same page and collaboration just happens more smoothly. I'm a big fan of pull requests too, it really streamlines code reviews for our scripts, making it so simple to track feedback and improvements. Plus. Having a clear, well-organized history of every single change brings real peace of mind. If anything ever goes sideways, it is so easy to revert back to a version that we know works. And then there is the Agent, this is not the basic auto complete tool from a year ago. Now, I just ask it to handle tasks like refactoring page objects or generating new test suites for specific cases, and it coordinates updates across various files. When running in agent mode, it even takes things a step further by executing the tests in the terminal. And if something fails, it tries to troubleshoot and sort it out on its own until everything passes. That level of self-healing really does feel like having an extra set of hands on the team If I'm dealing with a flaky test or a weird timeout in my REST Assured code, I just tag the agent. It digs into the logs to find out what went wrong and actually points out possible fixes. There was even a time last month when it noticed a race condition in our framework that I'd probably have spent hours, maybe even a whole day trying to isolate on my own. The amount of time it saves me, both in writing and debugging scripts, has made this the MVP in our current toolset.
  • Read All 823 Reviews

    Get unlimited access to verified peer reviews and insights

    Read unlimited Gartner-vetted product reviews
    View and share valuable product insights
    Download full product profiles
    Review products you use today

Recommended Gartner Insights

  • Critical Capabilities for DevOps Platforms (Transitioning to DevSecOps Platforms)
  • Magic Quadrant for DevOps Platforms (Transitioning to DevSecOps Platforms)
Powered by Google TranslateThis service may contain translations provided by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement. Gartner's use of this provider is for operational purposes and does not constitute an endorsement of its products or services.

Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences, and should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in this content nor makes any warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this content, about its accuracy or completeness, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use apply.


Software reviews and ratings for EMMS, BI, CRM, MDM, analytics, security and other platforms - Peer Insights by Gartner
Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQsPrivacyTerms of Use

©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.

All rights reserved.

User Sentiment About GitHub
Reviewer Insights for: GitHub
Deciding Factors: GitHub Vs. Market Average
Performance of GitHub Across Market Features

GitHub Likes & Dislikes

Like

Having all our Java and Selenium scripts stored in such a well organized, dependable environment has really made my day to day work a lot smoother. I especially like how the pull requests make it straightforward for my teammates to look over any updates I make and spot issues before anything gets merged to main. The agent is not just there to help with writing lines of code anymore, it really feels like I have an extra set of hands in the process. I can ask it to update several page objects at once or create a whole new test suite for a fresh scenario and it takes care of everything, even if that involves changing multiple files. If I run into a test failure, I can tell agent to handle it right there in the terminal, and it'll keep trying out solutions on its own until things work. I no longer have to spend ages doing all those tedious set-up and maintenance tasks I used to dread. I've also noticed a big improvement when it comes to debugging. When a stubborn test keeps failing, agent often spots those sneaky little mistakes I might miss myself, like a single-character typo in a JSON path. Thanks to this, my testing cycle is a lot smoother and tackling complex scripts doesn't feel overwhelming anymore. Honestly, I'd find it difficult to go back to coding without this kind of help.

Like

Having all our Java and Selenium scripts stored in such a well organized, dependable environment has really made my day to day work a lot smoother. I especially like how the pull requests make it straightforward for my teammates to look over any updates I make and spot issues before anything gets merged to main. The agent is not just there to help with writing lines of code anymore, it really feels like I have an extra set of hands in the process. I can ask it to update several page objects at once or create a whole new test suite for a fresh scenario and it takes care of everything, even if that involves changing multiple files. If I run into a test failure, I can tell agent to handle it right there in the terminal, and it'll keep trying out solutions on its own until things work. I no longer have to spend ages doing all those tedious set-up and maintenance tasks I used to dread. I've also noticed a big improvement when it comes to debugging. When a stubborn test keeps failing, agent often spots those sneaky little mistakes I might miss myself, like a single-character typo in a JSON path. Thanks to this, my testing cycle is a lot smoother and tackling complex scripts doesn't feel overwhelming anymore. Honestly, I'd find it difficult to go back to coding without this kind of help.

Like

Having all our Java and Selenium scripts stored in such a well organized, dependable environment has really made my day to day work a lot smoother. I especially like how the pull requests make it straightforward for my teammates to look over any updates I make and spot issues before anything gets merged to main. The agent is not just there to help with writing lines of code anymore, it really feels like I have an extra set of hands in the process. I can ask it to update several page objects at once or create a whole new test suite for a fresh scenario and it takes care of everything, even if that involves changing multiple files. If I run into a test failure, I can tell agent to handle it right there in the terminal, and it'll keep trying out solutions on its own until things work. I no longer have to spend ages doing all those tedious set-up and maintenance tasks I used to dread. I've also noticed a big improvement when it comes to debugging. When a stubborn test keeps failing, agent often spots those sneaky little mistakes I might miss myself, like a single-character typo in a JSON path. Thanks to this, my testing cycle is a lot smoother and tackling complex scripts doesn't feel overwhelming anymore. Honestly, I'd find it difficult to go back to coding without this kind of help.

Dislike

* Poor support - don't reply to your questions * Security controls are hard to implement - some CodeQL rules need to be applied at an individual repo level - very time consuming * Lack of visibility - we had scan that didn't run for over a year and the security dashboard at the organisation level didn't highlight the issue

Dislike

* Poor support - don't reply to your questions * Security controls are hard to implement - some CodeQL rules need to be applied at an individual repo level - very time consuming * Lack of visibility - we had scan that didn't run for over a year and the security dashboard at the organisation level didn't highlight the issue

Dislike

* Poor support - don't reply to your questions * Security controls are hard to implement - some CodeQL rules need to be applied at an individual repo level - very time consuming * Lack of visibility - we had scan that didn't run for over a year and the security dashboard at the organisation level didn't highlight the issue