Cursor Alternatives

4.5(63 Ratings)

Considering alternatives to Cursor? See what this market Cursor users also considered in their purchasing decision. When evaluating different solutions, potential buyers compare competencies in categories such as evaluation and contracting, integration and deployment, service and support, and specific product capabilities.

Check out real reviews verified by Gartner to see how Cursor compares to its competitors and find the best software or service for your organization.

Reviewed in Last 12 Months

How Alternatives Are Selected

1. Amazon Q Developer

By Amazon Web Services (AWS)

4.4

I tried Q Developer when it first came out, and it was not as effective as some of the other code generators on the market at the time. i tried it again recently and it blew me away. I used it to help on a project that our team was blocked on with some complex technical issues related to a variety of AWS services, and it talked through every stage of debugging, and was extremely concise and hnderatandable, and knowledgeable about the inner workings of services that i hadnt previously used.Read all insights and reviews for Amazon Q Developer

Compare with Cursor

Add to Compare

2. GitHub Copilot

4.4

Using GitHub Copilot has become a daily habit for my Selenium/java work. It's not just a fancy autocomplete anymore, the recent updates in have turned it into a proper coding partner. Having our automated test framework on GitHub makes the integration seamless. I use it mostly for boilerplate code, like generating those repetitive page object methods or writing snippets for our api tests. It's incredibly fast at picking up the patterns in the codebase, so it knows exactly how to name the variables and structure the tests without me having to explain it every time. The Copilot agent integration is the real game changer here. Unlike the standard suggestions, the agent can now look at my entire workspace and handle more complex tasks like refactoring an entire test suite or fixing a tricky race condition in our selenium scripts. I can just @workspace in the chat and ask it to find all tests that don't have proper teardown logic and it highlights them and offers a fix in seconds. It's also great for generating documentation for our test cases, which is something I used to spend way too much time on. I use copilot when I want to stay in the flow and write the code myself but with a lot of help. I use it for quick fixes and real-time suggestions, whereas I send the bigger, more time-consuming tasks over to other AI tools that I also use along with Copilot. Together, they make a powerful team. Copilot helps me with the logic and small details, and the other one handles the heavy lifting of building entire scenarios from scratch. It still has those moments where it suggests code that looks right but is actually slightly outdated it doesn't perfectly match our custom framework wrappers. Also, if I am working on a very large file, it can sometimes lose the context of what I was doing three hundred lines up. And just like with other tools, there's always that slight concern about it being a bit hallucinatory with library versions if it has not seen the latest updates yet. But honestly, for the speed and accuracy it provides in my daily Java development, it's hard to imagine going back to coding without it.Read all insights and reviews for GitHub Copilot

Compare with Cursor

Add to Compare

3. Gemini Code Assist

4.4

my overall experience with Gemini has been positive so far, especially for tasks involving real-time info and integration with Google's vast ecosystem. Its handling capacity of multiple inputs is cool and the speed of retrieving data and processing it is exceptional. However, I noticed that it sometimes lacks the depth and nuance found in other models during the creation of complex creative and reasoning tasks. There is a whole lot of scope to improve its efficacy. Read all insights and reviews for Gemini Code Assist

Compare with Cursor

Add to Compare

4. Windsurf

4.5

Overall experience has been great, have been using Windsurf for a couple of months now. The efficiency has increased tremendously after introducing it. There's still some room for refinement but worth 4 stars.Read all insights and reviews for Windsurf

Compare with Cursor

Add to Compare

5. Augment Code

By Augment Code

4.8

It's simply superb. Within 15 days, I already made a tool for my project which could have taken 6 to 7 months to make. I just integrated it with my IDE and with just a few simple English sentences it made the basic structure of the app. From there it was like, I gave instructions and it kept doing it step by step. Yes, sometimes it makes mistakes, it doesn't work as expected but it is completely based on your prompts and if something goes wrong we can discard the changes also. Read all insights and reviews for Augment Code

Compare with Cursor

Add to Compare

6. Qodo

4.5

It is an amazing tool, easily gets integrated to IDE and works fine for most of the cases, however there is need of improvement for Agentic mode.Read all insights and reviews for Qodo

Compare with Cursor

Add to Compare

7. Claude

4.8

At the time speaking Claude is the most brilliant AI for writing software's, its amazing how good it is compared to others and I really use it like for almost half of my tasks, the speed and accuracy of this product is good and there are mistakes but its keep developing and learning over time, I really love this product Read all insights and reviews for Claude

Compare with Cursor

Add to Compare

8. Replit

4.6

Replit is a great platform for developing, I been using it for a while now, since TypeScript appeared and honestly I love how convenient and accessible it makes coding, even the little features, it's just great on how it does things right, than the coding assistant comes and really makes the process of writing code to be more fun and enjoyable, you get suggestions about things you should and shouldn't do.Read all insights and reviews for Replit

Compare with Cursor

Add to Compare

Showing Result 1-8 of 22