Kiro Alternatives

Name: Review of Replit
Item: Replit
Rating: 4.6
Author: Verified Reviewer

AI Code Assistants (Transitioning to Enterprise AI...

Considering alternatives to Kiro? See what this market Kiro users also considered in their purchasing decision. When evaluating different solutions, potential buyers compare competencies in categories such as evaluation and contracting, integration and deployment, service and support, and specific product capabilities.

Check out real reviews verified by Gartner to see how Kiro compares to its competitors and find the best software or service for your organization.

Reviewed in Last 12 Months

How Alternatives Are Selected

1. Amazon Q Developer

By Amazon Web Services (AWS)

4.4

(423 Ratings)

We use Amazon Q to develop large-scale systems that involve device operation. Although we don't necessarily use cloud services, we feel that the agent's ability to provide a bird's-eye view across directories is very valuable.

Automated Translation from Japanese

Read all insights and reviews for Amazon Q Developer

Where Kiro Scored Higher

Better at service and support

Compare with Kiro

Add to Compare

2. GitHub Copilot

By GitHub

4.4

(292 Ratings)

Using GitHub Copilot has become a daily habit for my Selenium/java work. It's not just a fancy autocomplete anymore, the recent updates in have turned it into a proper coding partner. Having our automated test framework on GitHub makes the integration seamless. I use it mostly for boilerplate code, like generating those repetitive page object methods or writing snippets for our api tests. It's incredibly fast at picking up the patterns in the codebase, so it knows exactly how to name the variables and structure the tests without me having to explain it every time. The Copilot agent integration is the real game changer here. Unlike the standard suggestions, the agent can now look at my entire workspace and handle more complex tasks like refactoring an entire test suite or fixing a tricky race condition in our selenium scripts. I can just @workspace in the chat and ask it to find all tests that don't have proper teardown logic and it highlights them and offers a fix in seconds. It's also great for generating documentation for our test cases, which is something I used to spend way too much time on. I use copilot when I want to stay in the flow and write the code myself but with a lot of help. I use it for quick fixes and real-time suggestions, whereas I send the bigger, more time-consuming tasks over to other AI tools that I also use along with Copilot. Together, they make a powerful team. Copilot helps me with the logic and small details, and the other one handles the heavy lifting of building entire scenarios from scratch. It still has those moments where it suggests code that looks right but is actually slightly outdated it doesn't perfectly match our custom framework wrappers. Also, if I am working on a very large file, it can sometimes lose the context of what I was doing three hundred lines up. And just like with other tools, there's always that slight concern about it being a bit hallucinatory with library versions if it has not seen the latest updates yet. But honestly, for the speed and accuracy it provides in my daily Java development, it's hard to imagine going back to coding without it.

Read all insights and reviews for GitHub Copilot

Where Kiro Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with Kiro

Add to Compare

3. Gemini Code Assist

By Google

4.4

(259 Ratings)

Using the Gemini Code Assist proved to be a very efficient way to check, improve and develop new strengths on my coding abilities. It helped me to be more efficient in my tasks and bring more value to the company.

Read all insights and reviews for Gemini Code Assist

Where Kiro Scored Higher

Better at service and support

Compare with Kiro

Add to Compare

4. Cursor

By Anysphere

4.6

(90 Ratings)

Cursor has completely changed how I approach my work. Honestly, I'm not sure I could keep up with my current projects without it. I've used it to build out a full Detection-as-Code framework and to get far more value out of our SIEM, particularly around SOAR and automation. The planning mode has been especially useful for breaking complex projects into clear, time-bound phases. It's helped me stay on track while also allowing Cursor to reason through and support genuinely complex tasks alongside me.

Read all insights and reviews for Cursor

Where Kiro Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with Kiro

Add to Compare

5. Claude

By Anthropic

4.7

(82 Ratings)

Claude has been an excellent choice as our primary AI coding agent. The platform stands out for its advanced reasoning capabilities, strong task persistence, and a rapid feature release cadence. While token limits on the higher-end models and a few integration gaps create some friction, the overall experience has been highly positive and the platform has meaningfully improved our development workflows.

Read all insights and reviews for Claude

Where Kiro Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with Kiro

Add to Compare

6. Windsurf

By Windsurf

4.5

(77 Ratings)

Windsurf is by far the best agentic AI powered IDE and helping the developer community to increase the productivity by multiple times.

Read all insights and reviews for Windsurf

Where Kiro Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with Kiro

Add to Compare

7. Augment Code

By Augment Code

4.8

(41 Ratings)

Augment Code stands out for its fast and context aware coding suggestions. It integrates effortlessly with the development workflow and helps in writing code more effectively. Helps with understanding complex code base. Helps in code review. AI suggestions are relevant and save time during development and debugging.

Read all insights and reviews for Augment Code

Compare with Kiro

Add to Compare

8. Codex

By OpenAI

4.5

(36 Ratings)

Codex has been a strong productivity boost for well-scoped engineering tasks like refactors, test fixes, and codebase Q&A. We use it both in the cloud agent experience and locally through Codex CLI, and it works best when you give it a clear goal plus a way to verify results.

Read all insights and reviews for Codex

Where Kiro Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with Kiro

Add to Compare

Showing Result 1-8 of 27

This service may contain translations provided by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement. Gartner's use of this provider is for operational purposes and does not constitute an endorsement of its products or services.