HUMAN is a cybersecurity company that protects organizations by disrupting digital fraud and abuse. HUMAN solutions leverage modern defense to disrupt the economics of cybercrime by increasing the cost to cybercriminals while simultaneously reducing the cost of collective defense. Today HUMAN verifies the humanity of more than 30 trillion digital interactions per week across advertising, marketing, e-commerce, government, education and enterprise security.
Do You Manage Peer Insights at HUMAN Security?
Access Vendor Portal to update and manage your profile.
- Reputation: Human has held strong its reputation in the space as a trusted source of IVT detection - Service: Early in our partnership with WhiteOps/Human, I was often frustrated at the lack of attention to requests and other needs I had to use the product and interpret the results. That has completely changed. - UI: While Human has moved to a UI, I'm still using the legacy UI. It's like comfort food for me.
keeps us from getting into trouble with our buyers
I personally like accuracy and the available parameters in the mediaguard. In the world of high speed auctions, having access to granular data points such as detailed reasons and their respective definitions and SIVT classifications is incredibly valuable. Mediaguard provides transparency that we need to understand the underlying cause of why a particular request for flagged - whether it was due to automated browsing, spoofing attempts, etc.
1) I'd like more intel about how the fraud rate of our suppliers compare with the same suppliers that our peers that use Human observe. This would help us understand where we need to focus to improve quality. 2) I think there's likely value in some of the policy features. I think if Human would create trainings or videos on tips about how to get the most of these features, I'd use them more (I recently asked for best practices on how to use the delisted app reporting). 3) While I'm comfortable using the UI, I'd love a bit more customization. Case in point - I primarily pull reporting for our tool, yet every time I log in, I am forced to take the extra step of choosing our tool from the drop down (FS is the default)
IVT scores are not consistent across the same inventory when scanned by the same product. IVT scores are not consistent with any other product on the market (more of an issue of all IVT vendors not specific to this one)
1. I personally disliked their new explore layout as compared to their legacy layout. The older legacy layout was far easier to use and navigate. 2. When we intend to download a report, the generation process can take significant time. We often need to wait for a while before the report finally shows up in the 'Reports' section for downloading it. If the file size is larger or covers a broad range of parameters, the wait time increases even further. 3. When navigating to different sections of the explore, the filters don't always persist. At times, we need to re-select the same date ranges or fields that we want.