Overview
Service Information on LinkedIn Learning
What is LinkedIn Learning?
LinkedIn Learning Pricing
Overall experience with LinkedIn Learning
“High Instructor Expertise Benefits Learners, Yet Course Library Updates Remain Slow”
“Easy access and platform simplicity, but content depth remains lacking”
About Company
Company Description
LinkedIn, established in 2003, aims to improve productivity and spur success by connecting professionals globally. The network comprises over 850 million members, including specialized executives from across diverse industries. LinkedIn's operations span multiple product lines such as Talent Solutions, Marketing Solutions, Sales Solutions, and Premium Subscriptions. With the main office in Silicon Valley, LinkedIn has a worldwide presence with several global offices.
Company Details
Do You Manage Peer Insights at LinkedIn?
Access Vendor Portal to update and manage your profile.
Key Insights
A Snapshot of What Matters - Based on Validated User Reviews
Top LinkedIn Learning Alternatives
Peer Discussions
LinkedIn Learning Reviews and Ratings
- Software Developer<50M USDSoftwareReview Source
Easy access and platform simplicity, but content depth remains lacking
I have used many other enterprise learning/training platforms along with LinkedIn Learning. The licensing model and integration was similar for all products. The main difference was the content libraries offered by the platforms. LinkedIn has an average number of learning libraries. It has content on a lot of domains and technologies, but quality wise the content is not that good to achieve your learning goals. Content length and depth of knowledge is average. I am not criticizing it but want to be genuine with what I have experienced. So, the overall product is good, but the content needs a lot of improvement to be ready to be fit for enterprise training. There needs to be detailed training courses, also the depth of knowledge needs to be improved. We did not observe any technical issues while accessing the platform and the access mechanism was also simple, so support from the platform was not needed. Cost wise it could be cost effective compared to other platforms.



