runZero Alternatives

4.6(38 Ratings)

Considering alternatives to runZero? See what this market runZero users also considered in their purchasing decision. When evaluating different solutions, potential buyers compare competencies in categories such as evaluation and contracting, integration and deployment, service and support, and specific product capabilities.

Check out real reviews verified by Gartner to see how runZero compares to its competitors and find the best software or service for your organization.

Reviewed in Last 12 Months

How Alternatives Are Selected

1. OctoXLabs CAASM Platform

4.9

Our overall experience with Octoxlabs has been very positive. The platform has consistently delivered value in terms of visibility, security posture management, and efficiency. The product is intuitive to use and well-supported, though there is still some room for improvement in areas like advanced customization and reporting flexbility. Overall, Octoxlabs has been a reliable partner in strengthening our cyber asset attack surface management strategy.Read all insights and reviews for OctoXLabs CAASM Platform

Compare with runZero

Add to Compare

2. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

4.3

The two negatives that I'd share before going into the positives are not necessarily huge. However, they did affect my ability to work with the product and customize it. 1. Customer Service - The L1 technicians were often slow to respond and clearly used a templated response, without sharing knowledge of the issues among themselves. I'm not sure how this happens but there were a couple of instances where it took over a month to connect with someone who could assist in a troubleshooting session. 2. TAMs having varying skill levels - Currently, we have a Technical Account Manager who is very skilled in the product and also in the realm of vulnerability management. However, the TAMs have changed regularly before him, and the experience has been up and down. Qualys is pretty extensive, as well as being comprehensive. I would recommend having two or more well-versed operators in larger environments. Qualys also needs good planning, in order to make the most of what it has to offer. This would be done by way of already having a well-planned strategy that it is a part of. It's easy to get lost in the weeds. When configured correctly and in perspective of a good strategy, Qualys can be used to automate many important day to day processes and reporting. Again, though, Qualys needs to set up correctly. This is to prevent excessive time reconfiguring and recovering from incorrect implementation.Read all insights and reviews for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Where runZero Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with runZero

Add to Compare

3. Lansweeper

4.5

My overall experiencie with lansweeper has been positive, the platform provides a complete asset discovery and inventory solution, with a high capability for network scanning, device identification and integration with other it solutions. The main reason to my positive rating, while the product works well and it is accurate, it could be more intuitive with the querys in the database and customization of alerts. Some menus in the advanced configuration, such as configure and introduce all the VLANS is tedious and slow. The main problem from my experience is the identification of device mobiles information. Overall lansweeper is a solid and valuable solution for IT asset management, it help us to identify any new device connected to our network, but his perfomrnace and the difficulty to customize alerts and the detection of the mobile devices blocks me for give it 5 stars. Read all insights and reviews for Lansweeper

Where runZero Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with runZero

Add to Compare

4. Armis Centrix

4.4

We started using Armis to provide more visibility into our network, however, it is mostly limited to the visibility of the integrations linked with Armis. Much of what we see, we already see with our other tools. Armis doesn't provide us with much actionable data for our organization's needs. We have worked with three different account managers in the 2+ years we've utilized Armis and only one of them truly shone. The other 2 account managers seem to have limited knowledge on real use cases for their product and how to best help us. Even though we've had Armis for a while, it still feels like we're in the onboarding, testing out phase. While much of this is a reflection on our own internal team, I also find it reflects on Armis for not quite delivering what they are promising and not helping us understand how to better utilize their tool. Read all insights and reviews for Armis Centrix

Where runZero Scored Higher

Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with runZero

Add to Compare

5. Axonius Exposures

4.4

Our organization implemented Axonius to gain a consolidated view of all assets across a highly complex environment that spans both corporate IT and manufacturing operations. As a quality manager, I place significant emphasis on compliance, risk visibility and operational continuity. Prior to Axonuis, asset visibility was fragmented, with different teams relying on their own point solutions and manual reporting. The Axonius platform has significantly streamlined this by automatically aggregating data from multiple sources - endpoint detection, identity systems, vulnerability scanners and cloud providers-and presenting a unified, trustworthy inventory. One of the most valuable aspects has been the query builder, which lets us create custom logic to spot unmanaged devices or assets missing security agents without waiting on manual checks. This has improved our ability to validate compliance controls and quickly identify gaps that might otherwise go unnoticed.Read all insights and reviews for Axonius Exposures

Where runZero Scored Higher

Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with runZero

Add to Compare

6. JupiterOne

4.3

The JupiterOne security platform is good in dealing with the Integrations and asset of various sources that organize data in one single platform, the workflows and queries is much better to handle different vulnerability mgmt, incident response. The product also lacks in performance degradation as while fetching and querying large amount of data leads to slowdown the process and performance which consumes time. Jupiter one is not much good in remediation strategies as the built-in process is not better and requires external sources to handle and proceed. Licensing cost in small and medium business also needs to be reduced as it is high for the organizations to acquire. Read all insights and reviews for JupiterOne

Where runZero Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with runZero

Add to Compare

7. Splunk Asset and Risk Intelligence

By Cisco Systems (Splunk)

4.4

Splunk ARI helps us to get continuous, real-time visibility into our organization's "attack-surface" like all devices, users, and software in a network. This provides continuous asset discovery of everything on the network by correlating data already living in Splunk. Its ability to assign composite Risk Scoring to each asset based on its vulnerabilities, the seniority of the user and whether it lacks security agents like encryption or antivirus helps us with better Risk Scoring and Prioritization. The attack surface explorer helps us visually map the relationship between the user’s and devices.Read all insights and reviews for Splunk Asset and Risk Intelligence

Where runZero Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with runZero

Add to Compare

8. ThreatAware

4.7

I don't directly use this product, but in-fact used it during a month long proof of concept when we were trialling for an asset attack surface management solution. During the POC I found the product really easy to use an connect to our systems via API's. The layout was nice and was feature rich which was a bonus. The only part of the product I found to be a bit clunky was to sync with Active Directory we had to have a task schedule setup on a server with a powershell script which was having issues running, I wonder if there could have been a smoother way of doing this part but the rest easily integrated with API's. The reason we unfortunately did not choose the product was the price was too expensive for our budget and we moved to a more budget friendly solution with an existing supplier. There was an offer to move to a cheaper version of the product but we lost too many features we used during the POC which we didn't realise were only in the top tier version of the product. Read all insights and reviews for ThreatAware

Compare with runZero

Add to Compare

Showing Result 1-8 of 44