• HOME
  • CATEGORIES

    • CATEGORIES

    • Browse All Categories
  • FOR VENDORS

    • FOR VENDORS

    • Log In to Vendor Portal
    • Get Started
  • REVIEWS

    • REVIEWS

    • Write a Review
    • Product Reviews
    • Vendor Directory
    • Product Comparisons
  • GARTNER PEER COMMUNITY™
  • GARTNER.COM
  • Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQPrivacyTerms of Service
    ©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
    All rights reserved.
  • Categories

    • No categories available

      Browse All Categories

      Select a category to view markets

  • For Vendors

    • Log In to Vendor Portal 

    • Get Started 

  • Write a Review

Join / Sign In
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. UiPath Platform
Logo of UiPath Platform

UiPath Platform

byUiPath
in
4.6
2026
Market Presence: Robotic Process Automation, Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies

Overview

Product Information on UiPath Platform

Updated 5th May 2026

What is UiPath Platform?

UiPath is the Agentic Business Orchestration platform: a single enterprise control plane that coordinates end-to-end processes across AI agents, robots, people, documents, and applications. Unlike point automation tools that execute isolated tasks, UiPath manages the full process lifecycle: maintaining state across long-running workflows, handling dynamic cases with built-in exception management, and orchestrating multiple agents, regardless of where they were built, under a unified governance layer. This is what turns AI potential into reliable, measurable business execution. UiPath delivers this through a unified low-code/pro-code builder environment with natively integrated document understanding, enterprise-grade testing, and unmatched deployment flexibility across cloud and on-premises, so enterprises can scale agentic automation with the speed, safety, and control that production demands.

UiPath Platform Pricing

Overall experience with UiPath Platform

Data and Analytics Manager
10B - 30B USD, Manufacturing
FAVORABLE

“Early RPA Implementation : Operational Gains and Licensing Challenges Observed”

5.0
Apr 20, 2026
This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions.
IT Associate
3B - 10B USD, Healthcare and Biotech
CRITICAL

“Great Support and Beginner Friendly Interface But Recent Enhancements Create Challenges”

3.0
Apr 14, 2026
This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions.

Badges

Gartner Peer Insights recognizes vendors who meet or exceed both the market average Overall Experience and the market average User Interest and Adoption score through a Customers’ Choice distinction.
2026
For Market:
Robotic Process Automation
2026
For Market:
Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies

About Company

Company Description

Updated 7th December 2023

UiPath is a global entity whose focus lies in utilizing the transformative capabilities of AI and automation to unleash the limitless potential of individuals and facilitate human progress. Currently, the company is expanding its horizons beyond Robotic Process Automation, offering a highly effective and user-friendly AI-Powered Business Automation Platform. It is driven to bring together the leading minds to bring forth the next big leap in AI-powered automation. The company, based in New York City, operates developmental centers scattered throughout the United States, Romania, India, and Japan.

Company Details

Updated 26th February 2025
Company type
Public
Year Founded
2005
Head office location
New York, United States
Number of employees
1001 - 5000
Website
http://www.uipath.com

Do You Manage Peer Insights at UiPath?

Access Vendor Portal to update and manage your profile.

Key Insights

A Snapshot of What Matters - Based on Validated User Reviews

Top UiPath Platform Alternatives

Logo of Workato ONE
1. Workato ONE
4.9
(96 Ratings)
Logo of Agentic Process Automation System
2. Agentic Process Automation System
4.8
(84 Ratings)
Logo of Pipefy
3. Pipefy
4.7
(80 Ratings)
View All Alternatives

Peer Discussions

What Your Peers Are Saying About UiPath Platform

Director of IT
Any Automation CoE's that centralized enterprise RPA (ex: UiPath or AA) and low-Code automation (ex: MS Power Automate)  platforms as part of their organizations?  What were the primary drivers for organizing this way?  Benefits?
Program Director, Intelligent Automation + Entrepreneur
I have tried to decentralize RPA, but it's really difficult since to build them you need a software development background, it takes a month of training, and you need to be continuously building to keep one's skillset honed. RDA on the other hand is great to democratize.
See Full Discussion
22 Sep 20252.7k Views3 Comments
CIO
We have ServiceNow as a platform and I need to automate our Joiners, Movers and Leavers process. ServiceNow are trying to push their HR module which is overkill for what I need. We have also implemented some RPA with UiPath which seems to be going well. Has anyone been able to successfully automate JML? Is so, would you mind sharing any tips?
VP of IT
I would recommend RPA long term due to it's major reliance on the GUI. In theory you can MVP with RPA for a period of time until you have a more elegant solution leveraging for example an Azure pipeline that can trigger some of the actions needed on AD and other systems.
See Full Discussion
13 Nov 20232.8k Views2 Comments

UiPath Platform Reviews and Ratings

4.6

(256 Ratings)

Rating Distribution

5 Star
67%
4 Star
30%
3 Star
3%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%
Why ratings and reviews count differ?
  • Data and Analytics Manager
    10B+ USD
    Manufacturing
    Review Source

    Early RPA Implementation : Operational Gains and Licensing Challenges Observed

    5.0
    Apr 20, 2026
    I am a Senior Manager in the Digital Transformation division at my org and we have been working with UiPath for a few weeks as part of our early RPA footprint. Our initial scope is narrow but high-value: automating vendor invoice processing and SAP data entry, both of which are rules-heavy, high-volume workflows tightly coupled to SAP and our AP operations. Even at this early stage, with only a handful of bots in production, the platform has held up well under real workload conditions. From a development standpoint, UiPath Studio's workflow model (sequences, flowcharts, and state machines) has been a good fit for the branching logic in our invoice workflows, where header/line-item validation, PO matching, and exception routing need to coexist cleanly. Reusable libraries and the package/dependency model have let us standardize common components (SAP login, credential retrieval from Orchestrator assets, logging wrappers, retry-scope patterns) early, which should pay off as we scale. The SAP automation activities have been a particular strength: the dedicated SAP activities expose transaction-level controls that are more stable than generic UI automation, which has materially reduced selector fragility on SAP screens. Orchestrator has delivered the control-plane capabilities we expected from an enterprise RPA tool. Queues with SLA/priority handling, triggers, asset management for environment-specific configuration, and role-based access control line up well with our governance and audit requirements as a public-sector enterprise. Document Understanding has performed reasonably well on our invoice set, and combining the pre-trained invoice model with a validation station workflow for low-confidence extractions has given us an acceptable straight-through processing rate for structured invoices. On the less favorable side, licensing cost is a real planning constraint when sizing for enterprise-scale rollout. Version upgrades across Studio, activity packages, and Orchestrator require disciplined environment management. Debugging complex, multi-application workflows with dynamic selectors and transient exceptions has a steeper learning curve than the low-code positioning suggests. Even with a small production footprint, targeted processes have already reduced my team's manual effort by roughly 25-30%, and I expect that to grow significantly as we industrialize the pipeline and stand up a proper CoE. Overall, UiPath has been a capable foundation for our RPA journey, and my recommendation is to invest upfront in reusable frameworks, selector and exception-handling standards, Orchestrator governance, and disciplined license forecasting. Excellent to be precise.
  • Data and Analytics Manager
    10B+ USD
    Manufacturing
    Review Source

    Early RPA Implementation : Operational Gains and Licensing Challenges Observed

    5.0
    Apr 20, 2026
    I am a Senior Manager in the Digital Transformation division at my org and we have been working with UiPath for a few weeks as part of our early RPA footprint. Our initial scope is narrow but high-value: automating vendor invoice processing and SAP data entry, both of which are rules-heavy, high-volume workflows tightly coupled to SAP and our AP operations. Even at this early stage, with only a handful of bots in production, the platform has held up well under real workload conditions. From a development standpoint, UiPath Studio's workflow model (sequences, flowcharts, and state machines) has been a good fit for the branching logic in our invoice workflows, where header/line-item validation, PO matching, and exception routing need to coexist cleanly. Reusable libraries and the package/dependency model have let us standardize common components (SAP login, credential retrieval from Orchestrator assets, logging wrappers, retry-scope patterns) early, which should pay off as we scale. The SAP automation activities have been a particular strength: the dedicated SAP activities expose transaction-level controls that are more stable than generic UI automation, which has materially reduced selector fragility on SAP screens. Orchestrator has delivered the control-plane capabilities we expected from an enterprise RPA tool. Queues with SLA/priority handling, triggers, asset management for environment-specific configuration, and role-based access control line up well with our governance and audit requirements as a public-sector enterprise. Document Understanding has performed reasonably well on our invoice set, and combining the pre-trained invoice model with a validation station workflow for low-confidence extractions has given us an acceptable straight-through processing rate for structured invoices. On the less favorable side, licensing cost is a real planning constraint when sizing for enterprise-scale rollout. Version upgrades across Studio, activity packages, and Orchestrator require disciplined environment management. Debugging complex, multi-application workflows with dynamic selectors and transient exceptions has a steeper learning curve than the low-code positioning suggests. Even with a small production footprint, targeted processes have already reduced my team's manual effort by roughly 25-30%, and I expect that to grow significantly as we industrialize the pipeline and stand up a proper CoE. Overall, UiPath has been a capable foundation for our RPA journey, and my recommendation is to invest upfront in reusable frameworks, selector and exception-handling standards, Orchestrator governance, and disciplined license forecasting. Excellent to be precise.
  • Read All 372 Reviews

    Get unlimited access to verified peer reviews and insights

    Read unlimited Gartner-vetted product reviews
    View and share valuable product insights
    Download full product profiles
    Review products you use today

Recommended Gartner Insights

  • Critical Capabilities for Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies
  • Magic Quadrant for Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies
Powered by Google TranslateThis service may contain translations provided by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement. Gartner's use of this provider is for operational purposes and does not constitute an endorsement of its products or services.

Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences, and should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in this content nor makes any warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this content, about its accuracy or completeness, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use apply.


Software reviews and ratings for EMMS, BI, CRM, MDM, analytics, security and other platforms - Peer Insights by Gartner
Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQsPrivacyTerms of Use

©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.

All rights reserved.

User Sentiment About UiPath Platform
Deciding Factors: UiPath Platform Vs. Market Average

UiPath Platform Likes & Dislikes

Like

1) Native SAP integration via dedicated SAP automation activities: transaction-level controls have proven materially more stable than generic UI automation on our SAP screens, which is critical for a steel manufacturing enterprise running on SAP. 2) UiPath Studio developer experience: the visual workflow model (sequences, flowcharts, state machines), comprehensive activity library, reusable libraries, and the package/dependency model make it straightforward to standardize common components and move from concept to working automation quickly, even with a small team. 3) Orchestrator as an enterprise control plane: queue management with SLA/priority handling, time- and queue-based triggers, asset management for environment-specific configuration, centralized logging, and role-based access control align well with our governance and audit requirements as a public-sector enterprise. 4) Document Understanding for invoice processing: the pre-trained invoice model combined with a validation station workflow for low-confidence extractions has delivered a solid straight-through processing rate on structured and semi-structured vendor invoices, with a clear retraining path for vendor-specific templates. 5) End-to-end platform breadth: having development (Studio), orchestration (Orchestrator), document AI (Document Understanding), and attended/unattended execution under one stack simplifies vendor management and architecture decisions for a large enterprise program. Liked everything!

Like

1) Native SAP integration via dedicated SAP automation activities: transaction-level controls have proven materially more stable than generic UI automation on our SAP screens, which is critical for a steel manufacturing enterprise running on SAP. 2) UiPath Studio developer experience: the visual workflow model (sequences, flowcharts, state machines), comprehensive activity library, reusable libraries, and the package/dependency model make it straightforward to standardize common components and move from concept to working automation quickly, even with a small team. 3) Orchestrator as an enterprise control plane: queue management with SLA/priority handling, time- and queue-based triggers, asset management for environment-specific configuration, centralized logging, and role-based access control align well with our governance and audit requirements as a public-sector enterprise. 4) Document Understanding for invoice processing: the pre-trained invoice model combined with a validation station workflow for low-confidence extractions has delivered a solid straight-through processing rate on structured and semi-structured vendor invoices, with a clear retraining path for vendor-specific templates. 5) End-to-end platform breadth: having development (Studio), orchestration (Orchestrator), document AI (Document Understanding), and attended/unattended execution under one stack simplifies vendor management and architecture decisions for a large enterprise program. Liked everything!

Like

1) Native SAP integration via dedicated SAP automation activities: transaction-level controls have proven materially more stable than generic UI automation on our SAP screens, which is critical for a steel manufacturing enterprise running on SAP. 2) UiPath Studio developer experience: the visual workflow model (sequences, flowcharts, state machines), comprehensive activity library, reusable libraries, and the package/dependency model make it straightforward to standardize common components and move from concept to working automation quickly, even with a small team. 3) Orchestrator as an enterprise control plane: queue management with SLA/priority handling, time- and queue-based triggers, asset management for environment-specific configuration, centralized logging, and role-based access control align well with our governance and audit requirements as a public-sector enterprise. 4) Document Understanding for invoice processing: the pre-trained invoice model combined with a validation station workflow for low-confidence extractions has delivered a solid straight-through processing rate on structured and semi-structured vendor invoices, with a clear retraining path for vendor-specific templates. 5) End-to-end platform breadth: having development (Studio), orchestration (Orchestrator), document AI (Document Understanding), and attended/unattended execution under one stack simplifies vendor management and architecture decisions for a large enterprise program. Liked everything!

Dislike

1. its releases lot of products every year but i am not sure of the useability of everything, ex: Automation Ops, Automation Hub 2. I don't like the fact that they don't market themselves efficiently. And the utilization is very low 3. Some of the new enhancements that have happened are making things difficult for me. Ex: Migration of monitoring of bots to someplace else like UiPath Insights.

Dislike

1. its releases lot of products every year but i am not sure of the useability of everything, ex: Automation Ops, Automation Hub 2. I don't like the fact that they don't market themselves efficiently. And the utilization is very low 3. Some of the new enhancements that have happened are making things difficult for me. Ex: Migration of monitoring of bots to someplace else like UiPath Insights.

Dislike

1. its releases lot of products every year but i am not sure of the useability of everything, ex: Automation Ops, Automation Hub 2. I don't like the fact that they don't market themselves efficiently. And the utilization is very low 3. Some of the new enhancements that have happened are making things difficult for me. Ex: Migration of monitoring of bots to someplace else like UiPath Insights.

Reviewer Insights for: UiPath Platform