• HOME
  • CATEGORIES

    • CATEGORIES

    • Browse All Categories
  • FOR VENDORS

    • FOR VENDORS

    • Log In to Vendor Portal
    • Get Started
  • REVIEWS

    • REVIEWS

    • Write a Review
    • Product Reviews
    • Vendor Directory
    • Product Comparisons
  • GARTNER PEER COMMUNITY™
  • GARTNER.COM
  • Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQPrivacyTerms of Service
    ©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
    All rights reserved.
  • Categories

    • No categories available

      Browse All Categories

      Select a category to view markets

  • For Vendors

    • Log In to Vendor Portal 

    • Get Started 

  • Write a Review

Join / Sign In

Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences, and should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in this content nor makes any warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this content, about its accuracy or completeness, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use apply.


Software reviews and ratings for EMMS, BI, CRM, MDM, analytics, security and other platforms - Peer Insights by Gartner
Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQsPrivacyTerms of Use

©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.

All rights reserved.

Reviewed in Last 12 Months
How Alternatives Are Selected
Logo of Forcepoint DLP
1. Forcepoint DLP

By Forcepoint

4.4
(574 Ratings)

Our overall experience with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention has been mixed, and I would like to start with the challenges related to the agent. Compared to other solutions we have used, Forcepoint agents are updated very frequently - almost every 1-2 months. It is difficult to rely on a stable agent version, as new issues often arise and are later fixed through patches and new agent releases. One of the biggest challenges this creates is in agent deployment. Unlike other solutions that support seamless in-place upgrades on endpoints, Forcepoint requires us to redeploy agents using additional tools, which is not user-friendly. Another limitation is the lack of real-time visibility into agent status. In other systems, it is easy to see whether an endpoint is connected, disconnected, or has lost connection over time. However, in the Forcepoint management console, it is not always possible to clearly determine whether a device is currently active or if an agent has stopped working. We have also experienced issues with version stability. After the release of version 10.4 (following 10.3), several problems were encountered by organizations that upgraded. Versions were withdrawn, fixed, and re-released, but issues persisted, requiring another rollback and update cycle. In our opinion, such releases should undergo more thorough testing before being deployed to production environments, rather than effectively being tested in customer environments. Additionally, macOS agents have not always performed reliably in our experience. The inline proxy mode, while available, has not proven to be stable. Although it can still capture incidents without browser extensions, it may cause unnecessary browser blocking or create issues when accessing certain websites. Based on our testing, this mode negatively impacts user experience and has not been suitable for our environment. One of the most critical weaknesses is in the Application channel. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention performs quite poorly in this area, particularly with default Microsoft applications. For example, applications like Link to Windows or apps installed via Microsoft Store (such as WhatsApp or Telegram) are not properly detected for incident generation. The main issue is that Forcepoint relies on identifying applications via .exe files, whereas Microsoft Store applications do not operate in the same way. When we raised a support case, we were advised to block RuntimeBroker.exe for Microsoft Store WhatsApp. However, this process is not specific to a single application - many system components rely on the Runtime Broker. As a result, implementing such a block led to a large number of false positives and user dissatisfaction. Ultimately, we were unable to apply an effective and targeted control for these applications, which we consider to be one of the major limitations of the solution. Another limitation we have encountered is related to file fingerprinting. There is no option to define a custom similarity threshold when detecting matches. The percentage is fixed, and we cannot adjust it to better suit our requirements. Furthermore, when a fingerprint rule is created and applied to the printer channel, it does not function as expected-fingerprinting does not work on the printer channel. We have also observed issues with Pattern and Phrase detection. Even when configuring rules with the "only unique" option enabled, the system treats the same word written in uppercase and lowercase as different entries. This behavior can lead to excessive false positives, especially when specific thresholds are configured.

Read all insights and reviews for Forcepoint DLP

Where Adaptive Email DLP Scored Higher

  • Better at service and support
  • Easier to integrate and deploy
  • Better evaluation and contracting
Compare with Adaptive Email DLP
Logo of Cisco Umbrella
2. Cisco Umbrella

By Cisco Systems

4.4
(487 Ratings)

My overall experience with Cisco Umbrella has been very good. It has a stong DNS layer security and it blocks the malicious domains before establishing a connection with them . It is also a cloud-based SAAS solution so it works well for all types of users like remote users, on premise users, etc.

Read all insights and reviews for Cisco Umbrella

Where Adaptive Email DLP Scored Higher

  • Better at service and support
  • Easier to integrate and deploy
Compare with Adaptive Email DLP
Logo of Trellix Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
3. Trellix Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

By Trellix

4.5
(363 Ratings)

We have been using Trellix DLP for almost one year in our organization to monitor and protect sensitive data across endpoints and network. The solution provides strong policy control, device control, and data monitoring features. Deployment requires careful planning, but once configured, the product works reliably and provides good visibility into user activity and data movement. The support response was satisfactory and the documentation was helpful.

Read all insights and reviews for Trellix Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Where Adaptive Email DLP Scored Higher

  • Better at service and support
  • Easier to integrate and deploy
  • Better evaluation and contracting
Compare with Adaptive Email DLP
Logo of Symantec Data Loss Prevention
4. Symantec Data Loss Prevention

By Broadcom

4.5
(350 Ratings)

It gives us a very refined level of control to protect our data and prevents unauthorized attempts to transfer sensitive data across all channels including endpoints, email and cloud.

Read all insights and reviews for Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Where Adaptive Email DLP Scored Higher

  • Better at service and support
  • Easier to integrate and deploy
  • Better evaluation and contracting
Compare with Adaptive Email DLP
Logo of Proofpoint Enterprise Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
5. Proofpoint Enterprise Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

By Proofpoint

4.5
(208 Ratings)

Proofpoint's DLP platform is pretty comprehensive covering Email, Endpoint, and Cloud.

Read all insights and reviews for Proofpoint Enterprise Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Where Adaptive Email DLP Scored Higher

  • Better at service and support
  • Easier to integrate and deploy
Compare with Adaptive Email DLP
Logo of CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection
6. CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection

By CrowdStrike

4.7
(156 Ratings)

Our experience with CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection has been genuinely good overall.From the beginning, we sawa noticeable improvement in visibility into data movement, especially around identifying potential insider risks,which was a gap for us earlier. It also fits well with rest of the CrowdStrike ecosystem, so managing everything from one place has made our work easier.The initial setup required some effort, particularly in fine-tuning policies and managing alerts effectively.It wasn't too complex,but it did take some time to get things right.Once we moved past that phase, things became much smoother. Overall, it's a strong solution, but it does need some investment in time to get the best results.

Read all insights and reviews for CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection
Compare with Adaptive Email DLP
Logo of GTB Technologies DLP
7. GTB Technologies DLP

By GTB Technologies

4.7
(97 Ratings)

Good experience with product as well as customer care service.

Read all insights and reviews for GTB Technologies DLP
Compare with Adaptive Email DLP
Logo of Fortra DLP
8. Fortra DLP

By Fortra

4.5
(81 Ratings)

The platform provides strong data protection capabilities, especially in monitoring data exfiltration across endpoints and email. The policy and rule configuration is straight forward and flexible that allow us to customize to align with our organization's and compliance security requirements. From an operations perspective, the implementation and administration is very straightforward and the management console offers clear visibility into the alerts and user activity. The alerting and reporting pages are very useful for incident response and audit reporting.

Read all insights and reviews for Fortra DLP

Where Adaptive Email DLP Scored Higher

  • Better at service and support
  • Easier to integrate and deploy
  • Better evaluation and contracting
Compare with Adaptive Email DLP
Showing Result 1-8 of 56

Top Alternatives to Adaptive Email DLP

  • Forcepoint DLP
  • Cisco Umbrella
  • Trellix Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
  • Symantec Data Loss Prevention
  • Proofpoint Enterprise Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
  • CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection
  • GTB Technologies DLP
  • Fortra DLP
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Adaptive Email DLP
  4. /
  5. Alternatives
Logo of Adaptive Email DLP

Adaptive Email DLP Alternatives

4.6(151 Ratings)
Data Loss Prevention

Considering alternatives to Adaptive Email DLP? See what this market Adaptive Email DLP users also considered in their purchasing decision. When evaluating different solutions, potential buyers compare competencies in categories such as evaluation and contracting, integration and deployment, service and support, and specific product capabilities.

Check out real reviews verified by Gartner to see how Adaptive Email DLP compares to its competitors and find the best software or service for your organization.