Microsoft enables digital transformation for the era of an intelligent cloud and an intelligent edge. Its mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Microsoft is dedicated to advancing human and organizational achievement. Microsoft Security helps protect people and data against cyberthreats to give peace of mind.
Do You Manage Peer Insights at Microsoft?
Access Vendor Portal to update and manage your profile.
What I like most is how well generative AI services integrate with existing Azure components such as storage, networking, and security controls. We were able to connect AI services to existing applications without redesigning our architecture completely. Azure also provides enterprise-level controls around access management and compliance, which is important when working with AI models and sensitive data. The availability of managed services reduces the operational overhead compared to running AI infrastructure completely on your own.
When it comes to Microsoft Axure, I absolutely love the granular control that it has over virtually anything. MS Azure allows me to give many permissions to network users on a per0user or per-group basis. The control panel also allows me to provide specific controls for things like password policy and 2FA requirements. That's the most awesome thing I can think of.
Tight integration with MS 365, Intune and Entra ID for Identity and device management. Robust VM, networking and security capabilities that simplify hybrid-cloud ops. Comprehensive monitoring and management tools (azure monitor, log analytics, defender for cloud). Large ecosystem of templates, automaton options and 3rd party integrations.
One challenge we experienced is cost transparency. AI workloads can scale quickly, and it's sometimes difficult to predict expenses during experimentation phases. Monitoring and optimization require active attention. Documentation and service options can also feel overwhelming, especially since Azure's AI offerings are evolving rapidly. It's not always obvious which service or architecture pattern is the right choice. In addition, regional availability and quota limitations occasionally slowed down our testing efforts.
I dislike the prices and the admin panel design. When I was using it a while back, I noticed that MS Azure had higher prices in a lot of areas than did the competition. I think they would take money from the competition if they just lowered prices a little bit.
Pricing structure is very complex. Unexpected costs can appear when workloads scale or when monitoring and backup services aren't properly scoped. The portal UI can feel inconsistent across different Azure services. Some settings are buried several layers deep. Documentation occasionally lags behind new feature releases, making deployment of new services more trial and error than it should be.