• HOME
  • CATEGORIES

    • CATEGORIES

    • Browse All Categories
  • FOR VENDORS

    • FOR VENDORS

    • Log In to Vendor Portal
    • Get Started
  • REVIEWS

    • REVIEWS

    • Write a Review
    • Product Reviews
    • Vendor Directory
    • Product Comparisons
  • GARTNER PEER COMMUNITY™
  • GARTNER.COM
  • Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQPrivacyTerms of Service
    ©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
    All rights reserved.
  • Categories

    • No categories available

      Browse All Categories

      Select a category to view markets

  • For Vendors

    • Log In to Vendor Portal 

    • Get Started 

  • Write a Review

Join / Sign In
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Amazon Web Services
Logo of Amazon Web Services

Amazon Web Services

byAmazon Web Services (AWS)
in
4.6
2026
Market Presence: Strategic Cloud Platform Services, Generative AI Infrastructure Providers (Transitioning to Cloud AI Infrastructure)

Overview

Product Information on Amazon Web Services

Updated 13th October 2025

What is Amazon Web Services?

Amazon Web Services is a cloud computing software that offers on-demand computing power, storage, and a broad set of services such as database management, networking, analytics, machine learning, and security. It provides infrastructure resources and platform tools that enable organizations to deploy, manage, and scale applications and workloads in the cloud. The software addresses challenges related to infrastructure scalability, data storage, cost management, disaster recovery, and application deployment by offering a pay-as-you-go model and a range of configurable resources suited for different business needs.

Amazon Web Services Pricing

Amazon Web Services software uses a pay-as-you-go pricing model where users are charged based on actual usage of compute power, storage, and other resources. The software also offers tiered pricing for certain services, volume discounts, and reserved instance options. There are no upfront costs, and users can access free usage tiers for select services within specified limits.

Overall experience with Amazon Web Services

Lead Cloud Infrastructure Specialist
30B + USD, Finance (non-banking)
FAVORABLE

“Consistent integration achieved despite operational hurdles and regional feature limits”

4.0
Jul 28, 2026
This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions.
Product Support Manager
<50M USD, Software
CRITICAL

“Consistent Functionality Noted Alongside Desire for Greater EU Server Choices”

3.0
Mar 10, 2026
This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions. This text serves as a placeholder and does not reflect the user’s review responses or opinions.

Badges

Gartner Peer Insights recognizes vendors who meet or exceed both the market average Overall Experience and the market average User Interest and Adoption score through a Customers’ Choice distinction.
2026
For Market:
Strategic Cloud Platform Services

About Company

Company Description

Updated 6th March 2025

Amazon Web Services (AWS), established in 2006, is focused on providing essential infrastructure services to businesses globally in the form of cloud computing. The key advantage offered through cloud computing, particularly via AWS, is its capacity to shift fixed infrastructure expenses into flexible costs. Businesses have been able to forgo extensive planning and procurement of servers and other Information Technology (IT) resources, owing to AWS. AWS seeks to provide businesses with prompt and cost-effective access to resources using Amazon's expertise and economies of scale, as and when their business requires. Currently, AWS offers a robust, scalable, economic infrastructure platform on the cloud powering an extensive array of businesses worldwide. It operates across numerous industries with data center locations in various parts of the globe including U.S., Europe, Singapore, and Japan.

Company Details

Updated 23rd December 2024
Company type
Public
Year Founded
2006
Head office location
Seattle, United States
Number of employees
10001+
Website
http://aws.amazon.com

Do You Manage Peer Insights at Amazon Web Services (AWS)?

Access Vendor Portal to update and manage your profile.

Key Insights

A Snapshot of What Matters - Based on Validated User Reviews

Top Amazon Web Services Alternatives

Logo of Microsoft Azure
1. Microsoft Azure
4.5
(2302 Ratings)
Logo of Google Cloud Platform
2. Google Cloud Platform
4.7
(1970 Ratings)
Logo of Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3)
3. Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3)
4.7
(781 Ratings)
View All Alternatives

Peer Discussions

Amazon Web Services Reviews and Ratings

4.6

(5267 Ratings)

Rating Distribution

5 Star
57%
4 Star
39%
3 Star
3%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%
Why ratings and reviews count differ?
  • Lead Cloud Infrastructure Specialist
    10B+ USD
    Finance (non-banking)
    Review Source

    Consistent integration achieved despite operational hurdles and regional feature limits

    4.0
    Jul 28, 2026
    Reliability & Uptime: My experience has been generally strong in production-like and lower environments when we followed vendor-approved patterns (Service Catalog provisioning, VPC/private network connectivity, IAM least privilege, and managed service defaults). Bedrock, QuickSight, and Sagemaker AI components were stable once the network configurations and role boundaries were correct. Support Quality: AWS and internal platform support were effective for blocker-level issues, especially around service enablement and permissions. The best outcomes came when tickets included the exact account/region, role ARN, and reproduction steps. Integration Success: Integration was successful but not "plug-and-play". The biggest wins came from standardizing deployment through Service Catalog for Amazon Q Business, Bedrock AgentCore runtime/gateway targets, and SageMaker domain setup. This reduced drift and made troubleshooting repeatable. Business Impact: We moved from ad hoc experimentation to repeatable implementation patterns for RAF, analytics copilot, and ingestion automation. Time-to-first-solution improved after guardrails and templates were in place. Scenario 1: In QuickSight + Snowflake integration, we use VPC connectivity and service accounts (not user SSO) for asynchronous dataset refresh. We confirmed that RBAC and masking policies were enforced at query time in Direct Query mode, and we handled SPICE data-visibility constraints by creating role-specific datasets. Scenario 2: In Bedrock AgentCore deployment, we implemented admin controls such as: Runtime + Gateway + Memory with Service Catalog and IAM controls. Initial friction came from auth/config nuances and network pathing, but once standardized, the deployment became reproducible for additional teams.
  • Lead Cloud Infrastructure Specialist
    10B+ USD
    Finance (non-banking)
    Review Source

    Consistent integration achieved despite operational hurdles and regional feature limits

    4.0
    Jul 28, 2026
    Reliability & Uptime: My experience has been generally strong in production-like and lower environments when we followed vendor-approved patterns (Service Catalog provisioning, VPC/private network connectivity, IAM least privilege, and managed service defaults). Bedrock, QuickSight, and Sagemaker AI components were stable once the network configurations and role boundaries were correct. Support Quality: AWS and internal platform support were effective for blocker-level issues, especially around service enablement and permissions. The best outcomes came when tickets included the exact account/region, role ARN, and reproduction steps. Integration Success: Integration was successful but not "plug-and-play". The biggest wins came from standardizing deployment through Service Catalog for Amazon Q Business, Bedrock AgentCore runtime/gateway targets, and SageMaker domain setup. This reduced drift and made troubleshooting repeatable. Business Impact: We moved from ad hoc experimentation to repeatable implementation patterns for RAF, analytics copilot, and ingestion automation. Time-to-first-solution improved after guardrails and templates were in place. Scenario 1: In QuickSight + Snowflake integration, we use VPC connectivity and service accounts (not user SSO) for asynchronous dataset refresh. We confirmed that RBAC and masking policies were enforced at query time in Direct Query mode, and we handled SPICE data-visibility constraints by creating role-specific datasets. Scenario 2: In Bedrock AgentCore deployment, we implemented admin controls such as: Runtime + Gateway + Memory with Service Catalog and IAM controls. Initial friction came from auth/config nuances and network pathing, but once standardized, the deployment became reproducible for additional teams.
  • Read All 6,003 Reviews

    Get unlimited access to verified peer reviews and insights

    Read unlimited Gartner-vetted product reviews
    View and share valuable product insights
    Download full product profiles
    Review products you use today

Recommended Gartner Insights

  • Critical Capabilities for Strategic Cloud Platform Services
  • Magic Quadrant for Strategic Cloud Platform Services
Powered by Google TranslateThis service may contain translations provided by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement. Gartner's use of this provider is for operational purposes and does not constitute an endorsement of its products or services.

Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences, and should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in this content nor makes any warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this content, about its accuracy or completeness, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use apply.


Software reviews and ratings for EMMS, BI, CRM, MDM, analytics, security and other platforms - Peer Insights by Gartner
Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQsPrivacyTerms of Use

©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.

All rights reserved.

User Sentiment About Amazon Web Services
Reviewer Insights for: Amazon Web Services
Performance of Amazon Web Services Across Market Features

Amazon Web Services Likes & Dislikes

Like

- Strong managed-services foundation with clear architecture paths: Bedrock, Sagemaker AI, QuickSight, and Q services let us assemble enterprise patterns without extensive code management or managing core model infrastructure. This resulted in faster environment setup and fewer custom platform components to maintain and monitor. - Good enterprise control points: IAM, VPC integrations, encryption, logging/monitoring, and policy-based controls are mature. Resulting in easier compliance alignment and clearer auditability for regulated workflows. - Flexible GenAI pattern coverage: We were able to support multiple patterns (RAG with Kendra/PgVector, agentic orchestration with AgentCore, analytics copilot with QuickSight/Q, and ingestion pipelines with BDA Step Functions/Lambda). Ultimately providing us with one cloud ecosystem covering multiple use cases without re-platforming. - Service Catalog-led provisioning: This materially improved consistency for Q Business, Sagemaker, and AgentCore artifacts. Leading to fewer environment-specific surprises and easier handoff to operations.

Like

- Strong managed-services foundation with clear architecture paths: Bedrock, Sagemaker AI, QuickSight, and Q services let us assemble enterprise patterns without extensive code management or managing core model infrastructure. This resulted in faster environment setup and fewer custom platform components to maintain and monitor. - Good enterprise control points: IAM, VPC integrations, encryption, logging/monitoring, and policy-based controls are mature. Resulting in easier compliance alignment and clearer auditability for regulated workflows. - Flexible GenAI pattern coverage: We were able to support multiple patterns (RAG with Kendra/PgVector, agentic orchestration with AgentCore, analytics copilot with QuickSight/Q, and ingestion pipelines with BDA Step Functions/Lambda). Ultimately providing us with one cloud ecosystem covering multiple use cases without re-platforming. - Service Catalog-led provisioning: This materially improved consistency for Q Business, Sagemaker, and AgentCore artifacts. Leading to fewer environment-specific surprises and easier handoff to operations.

Like

- Strong managed-services foundation with clear architecture paths: Bedrock, Sagemaker AI, QuickSight, and Q services let us assemble enterprise patterns without extensive code management or managing core model infrastructure. This resulted in faster environment setup and fewer custom platform components to maintain and monitor. - Good enterprise control points: IAM, VPC integrations, encryption, logging/monitoring, and policy-based controls are mature. Resulting in easier compliance alignment and clearer auditability for regulated workflows. - Flexible GenAI pattern coverage: We were able to support multiple patterns (RAG with Kendra/PgVector, agentic orchestration with AgentCore, analytics copilot with QuickSight/Q, and ingestion pipelines with BDA Step Functions/Lambda). Ultimately providing us with one cloud ecosystem covering multiple use cases without re-platforming. - Service Catalog-led provisioning: This materially improved consistency for Q Business, Sagemaker, and AgentCore artifacts. Leading to fewer environment-specific surprises and easier handoff to operations.

Dislike

The only thing is that we would love to see more secure/ European options. Keeping servers and the full cycle within the EU. This does not have to do with user experience or design, but rather demands for compliance.

Dislike

The only thing is that we would love to see more secure/ European options. Keeping servers and the full cycle within the EU. This does not have to do with user experience or design, but rather demands for compliance.

Dislike

The only thing is that we would love to see more secure/ European options. Keeping servers and the full cycle within the EU. This does not have to do with user experience or design, but rather demands for compliance.