Logo of Cursor

Cursor Alternatives

4.4(53 Ratings)

Considering alternatives to Cursor? See what this market Cursor users also considered in their purchasing decision. When evaluating different solutions, potential buyers compare competencies in categories such as evaluation and contracting, integration and deployment, service and support, and specific product capabilities.

Check out real reviews verified by Gartner to see how Cursor compares to its competitors and find the best software or service for your organization.

Reviewed in Last 12 Months
How Alternatives Are Selected
1. Gemini

By Google

4.5
(229 Ratings)
my overall experience with Gemini has been positive so far, especially for tasks involving real-time info and integration with Google's vast ecosystem. Its handling capacity of multiple inputs is cool and the speed of retrieving data and processing it is exceptional. However, I noticed that it sometimes lacks the depth and nuance found in other models during the creation of complex creative and reasoning tasks. There is a whole lot of scope to improve its efficacy. Read all insights and reviews for Gemini

Where Cursor Scored Higher

  • Easier to integrate and deploy
Compare with Cursor
2. GitHub Copilot

By GitHub

4.4
(220 Ratings)
Github Copilot can make some tedious work faster, such as writing repetitive variables, inferring simple continuations of what you are writing, but it has its issues. It will be inconsistent when offering help some time refusing to do some actions, and then doing them if you keep asking for help with the same prompt. The auto-write feature can also be very intrusive, to the point where a lot of people in my company found more usefulness in turning it off entirely. Also, at the time of this review, sometimes it can get in the way of the compiler being set up with certain integrations as an extension, and the only way to bring up said compilers is to disable, restart, and then enable copilot again. Read all insights and reviews for GitHub Copilot
Compare with Cursor
3. Amazon Q Developer

By Amazon Web Services (AWS)

4.4
(114 Ratings)
We already use AWS infrastructure. It was easy to setup accounts for the team ans start using it. THe product augmented the productivity of the team significantlyRead all insights and reviews for Amazon Q Developer

Where Cursor Scored Higher

  • Easier to integrate and deploy
Compare with Cursor
4. Windsurf

By Windsurf

4.5
(71 Ratings)
My overall experience with Windsurf has been outstanding. It significantly boosted my productivity and simplified my workflow. I no longer have to juggle multiple extensions or constantly switch to external tools . Everything is built-in, intuitive, and fast. The support team was also incredibly helpful and generous when I faced an issue during the trial period. That level of customer care really stood out to me.Read all insights and reviews for Windsurf

Where Cursor Scored Higher

  • Easier to integrate and deploy
Compare with Cursor
5. Augment Code

By Augment Code

4.8
(38 Ratings)
Our experience with Augment has been excellent and have been using it for over 6 months with about 70 users. We transitioned from a competitor product after using it for a year. We found Augment to have better context awareness for our existing large code base with more accurate and relevant autocomplete and chat, with lower latency, and had great IDE support. Beyond the engineers, we love the Slack bot which has been a game changer. This allows product managers and customer facing teams to self-serve technical information and product behavior questions without escalating to engineering. This lowers our overhead and gets answers to customers faster. The chatbot is also handy for doing technical planning, generating requirements docuemnts, technical plans, etc. We also like the high-touch support with a shared slack channel and regular detailed usage and adoption reports. Read all insights and reviews for Augment Code
Compare with Cursor
6. Qodo Gen

By Qodo

4.5
(33 Ratings)
It is an amazing tool, easily gets integrated to IDE and works fine for most of the cases, however there is need of improvement for Agentic mode.Read all insights and reviews for Qodo Gen

Where Cursor Scored Higher

  • Easier to integrate and deploy
Compare with Cursor
7. GitLab Duo

By GitLab

4.3
(17 Ratings)
My overall experience was good, I got the help I needed and the process was clear I didn't face any major issues, its a perfect platform for beginnersRead all insights and reviews for GitLab Duo

Where Cursor Scored Higher

  • Easier to integrate and deploy
Compare with Cursor
8. JetBrains AI Assistant

By JetBrains

4.2
(16 Ratings)
Both the AI Assistant and Junie generally work well - when provided with appropriate instructions. I tend to use it for short tasks that take 3-5 minutes of agent time, which would have taken me 30-40 minutes of work. Great for going through lots of documents (like SQL files) to come up with code that works reasonably well.Read all insights and reviews for JetBrains AI Assistant

Where Cursor Scored Higher

  • Better at service and support
  • Easier to integrate and deploy
Compare with Cursor
Showing Result 1-8 of 20