Cisco Meraki MX appliances Alternatives

4.6(486 Ratings)

Network Firewalls (Transitioning to Hybrid Mesh...

Considering alternatives to Cisco Meraki MX appliances? See what this market Cisco Meraki MX appliances users also considered in their purchasing decision. When evaluating different solutions, potential buyers compare competencies in categories such as evaluation and contracting, integration and deployment, service and support, and specific product capabilities.

Check out real reviews verified by Gartner to see how Cisco Meraki MX appliances compares to its competitors and find the best software or service for your organization.

Reviewed in Last 12 Months

How Alternatives Are Selected

1. FortiGate: Next Generation Firewall (NGFW)

4.6

It's expensive, not very straightforward to learn, and the knowledgebase is not kept up to date or easy to locate tutorials and guides for common issues. We were also told over 5 years into using that we were sold demo equipment by a Fortinet partner and subsequently told we had to buy new hardware because ours was blacklisted by Fortinet. They have a very questionable sales process which did not sit well with us, and it was hard to even find an alternate vendor who was open to a working business relationship versus looking to make a quick commission and move on. Read all insights and reviews for FortiGate: Next Generation Firewall (NGFW)

Compare with Cisco Meraki MX appliances

Add to Compare

2. Check Point Quantum

By Check Point Software Technologies

4.5

Check Point Quantum feels powerful and reliable, with strong threat protection, but its setup is complex and the licensing a bit opaque. Overall experience is good, email protection provided by Quantum is not outstanding, quarantine management is a missing feature.Read all insights and reviews for Check Point Quantum

Where Cisco Meraki MX appliances Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy

Compare with Cisco Meraki MX appliances

Add to Compare

3. Sophos Firewall

4.8

My overall experience with Sophos Firewall in a hospital work environment has been extremely positive. In a setting where the security of sensitive patient data and the operational continuity of IT infrastructure are critical Sophoa has proven to be a reliable, effective , and easy-to-manage solution. The user interface is intuitive , which has made daily management easier even in complex evironment like healthcare. Features such as granular traffic control , advanced threat protection, and real-time monitoring have been essential in securing the network and connected device, including those used for diagnostics clinical systems. The integration with Sophos Central has been especially valuable , allowing us to centrally manage security across both firewalls and endpoints, improving our responsiveness to alerts and anomalies. The tecnical support has also been responsive and competent whenever we needed assistance. In summary Sophos Firewall has played a significant role in strengthening the cybersecurity posture of the hospital environment where i work , without compromising service accessibility , and has actively supported our compliance and data protection needs.Read all insights and reviews for Sophos Firewall

Compare with Cisco Meraki MX appliances

Add to Compare

4. PA-Series

By Palo Alto Networks

4.6

My company selected PaloAlto to replace our other on-premise firewalls, based on their market rating in security and their ability to centralize the management of the firewalls from one single pane of glass. During our transition the PA sales team pushed for us to go to Strata Cloud Manager (SCM) vs Panorama, due to their roadmap for SCM. However, our deployment suffered many delays and roadblocks due to the SCM platform not being ready for primetime. Training for SCM was not available directly from PA or any of their training partners, which was the first issue. We found a lot of opportunities in the SCM platform as well when it came to pushing out changes to to managed firewalls, where we ran into an issue where if two different administrators push config changes to the same firewall, it creates a conflict in SCM where it loses the ability to manage the firewall, it seems like they should have something in place to prevent that from happening. The PA sales team did offer up a 2-day on-premise training session for SCM, but due to our project schedule it happened after implementation, thus the team had to really rely on PA Professional services to get the job done. The platform is working well now in run-state and the team using the training has a better pulse on managing the device more effectively. Read all insights and reviews for PA-Series

Where Cisco Meraki MX appliances Scored Higher

Better at service and support

Compare with Cisco Meraki MX appliances

Add to Compare

5. Cisco Secure Firewall

By Cisco Systems

4.6

Utilizamos hardware de Cisco desde hace 15 anos y nos provee seguridad perimetral y de acceso, la experiencia es excelente ya que nos protege de ataques externos y nos provee seguridad entre sitios y conectividad mediante VPN.Read all insights and reviews for Cisco Secure Firewall

Where Cisco Meraki MX appliances Scored Higher

Easier to integrate and deploy

Compare with Cisco Meraki MX appliances

Add to Compare

6. Unified Security Gateway (USG)

4.9

It's quite a powerful machine, easy to use, with a clear UI, and at the 1/3 of the cost from other vendors Read all insights and reviews for Unified Security Gateway (USG)

Compare with Cisco Meraki MX appliances

Add to Compare

7. SonicWall NSa Series

4.6

I've used these firewalls for years and they have been great and easy to manage. I've tried other firewalls and these seem to be easier to manage and deploy.Read all insights and reviews for SonicWall NSa Series

Where Cisco Meraki MX appliances Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy

Compare with Cisco Meraki MX appliances

Add to Compare

8. Firebox

4.5

Después del ataque de ransomware que tuvimos el año pasado, hemos avanzado en el fortalecimiento de nuestra postura de seguridad. Sin embargo, mi equipo no está satisfecho con el rendimiento y las capacidades de los dispositivos watchguard firebox ya que han mostrado limitaciones en la detección y respuesta ante este incidente. Actualmente estamos evaluando alternativas más robustas.Read all insights and reviews for Firebox

Compare with Cisco Meraki MX appliances

Add to Compare

...

Showing Result 1-8 of 72