Prisma SD-WAN Alternatives

My overall experience with FortiGate secure SDWAN implementation on FortiGate has been positive. The solution provides strong integration between networking and security. Allowing centralized management of wan connectivity Another advantage is the visibility into application traffic and the ability to prioritize critical services such as voice, video conferencing, and business applications. As per my hands-on and experience with the FortiGate SDWAN is very good.

We have been using Versa SD-WAN in a multi-site enterprise environment. Overall, it is a solid and capable solution, especially organization that wants network and security tightly integrated.

we need to deploy a large number of video surveillance devices to monitor our transmission lines. A stable and reliable network is required to transmit surveillance information back. Huawei SD-WAN solution is excellent in reliability. Huawei SD-WAN solution provides various reliability policies to meet our requirements.In addition, Huawei provides various network devices that support PoE, 5G, and outdoor low-temperature installation,meeting our requirement for device environment.

very clear and precise system, always good to fully understand the kpis,

The experience with the SD-WAN service was very beneficial, due to its ease of use, which allows for the deployment and management of modern networks under the entire Meraki infrastructure. The initial configuration is quick and straightforward, and the centralized management reduces the administrative burden. One of the key aspects is the implementation of dynamic routing and dynamic load balancing.

Velocloud has been a fairly good experience overall. It improved our network stability and made managing multiple sites more convenient, especially with cloud-based monitoring. I also like that it helps prioritize important traffic for better performance. On the downside, the setup and troubleshooting can sometimes be complicated, and teh interface takes time to fully get used to. Overall, it's a reliable solution, but there's still room for improvement in usability and support.

Overall experience with Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN has been excellent, and the platform deserves my 5-star rating. The combination of rock-solid stability, intelligent traffic steering, and simple centralised orchestration has significantly improved the way we manage and optimise the network. What worked well was that once deployed, the solution has been consistently stable across all sites. The centralized management interface makes policy creation, monitoring and troubleshooting far more intuitive than traditional WAN tools. Real-time traffic steering has noticeably improved application performance, especially for cloud services. Templates and zero touch provisioning have reduced the rollout time and minimised configuration. What didn't work as well was the learning of the orchestrator. The basics are straightforward, but some of the deeper configuration options require time and training to fully master. The built in analytics are useful, but more customisable dashboards would make it a lot better.

Using Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN has been great, deploying new routers with Cisco vmanage templates simplifies and standardizes deployments which keeps us consistent and secure. It's also much faster than manual configuration. It also allows us to see all of our SD-WAN routers in one place and perform actions in bulk.