Cisco Crosswork Network Services Orchestrator Alternatives

This tool was a welcome addition for our networking team as they finally had a tool that would help reduce the number of inbound questions to them regarding how things were mapped or worked. The network mapping and being able to visualize it really helped to streamline these conversations with end users as well as trouble shooting as path analysis was more easily done along with performance monotiring for any spikes or blocks. We really enjoyed being able to finally expose our network not only as a generated map but at times a live map to really make things transparent for all team members. This helped our network team to not only visualize but also in real time trouble shoot bottle necks before issues impacted more of our network.

One of the most unique features is Platform Connect. While most vendors require a "rip-and-replace" approach to move to the cloud, SolarWinds allows us to link our Self-Hosted on-premise environment directly to the SaaS platform.

Overall, the experience with ManageEngine network Configuration Manager has been very positive. The tool delivers strong performance in centralized configuration management and has proven highly effective for backup automation as well as for controlling and auditing network changes. ManageEngine is a trusted and reliable vendor, offering well-positioned asset and network management solutions. It provides a modern, fully in-house platform that enables efficient management of network and IT infrastructure with complete visibility. Additionally, it supports multivendor orchestration, and the system integrates well with other applications and provides strong performance.

Overall, we ha a good experience with Tufin. There are still some areas that require improvement (Such as Gui enhancements and certain functions), but in general, the platform is very helpful, especially when compliance is involved. Tufin allows us to gain better visibility into our network and understand what is happening based on our configurations, suck risky ports and usage.

We brought the Ansible Automation Platform into our environment about two years ago, mainly because our infra team was drowning in repetitive config work across roughly 150 servers and a mix of network gear. It wasn't a magic switch, the first 3-4 months we spent mostly cleaning up inventories and rewriting the early playbooks our admins put together. But once we got past that hump, the plarform has genuinely held up its end. Deployments are predictable now, audit trails are clean, and my ops team finally gets weekends back. Red Hat's support has been responsive to the tickets we've raised. The only thing that keeps coming up internally is cost, which I jave to defend at every renewal.

We've been running BackBox in our multi-site network environment for just over a year, primarily for automated configuration backup and compliance auditing across our firewall and switching infrastructure. The platform covered a gap we'd been patching manually for too long. Deployment was straightforward and the device coverage out of the box was broader than most alternatives we evaluated.

skybox is very good tool and we get very informative details related to network security part.

OpenText Network Automation provides a stable, enterprise-grade platform for automating network configuration, compliance and change management across multi-vendor environments.