• HOME
  • CATEGORIES

    • CATEGORIES

    • Browse All Categories
  • FOR VENDORS

    • FOR VENDORS

    • Log In to Vendor Portal
    • Get Started
  • REVIEWS

    • REVIEWS

    • Write a Review
    • Product Reviews
    • Vendor Directory
    • Product Comparisons
  • GARTNER PEER COMMUNITY™
  • GARTNER.COM
  • Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQPrivacyTerms of Service
    ©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
    All rights reserved.
  • Categories

    • No categories available

      Browse All Categories

      Select a category to view markets

  • For Vendors

    • Log In to Vendor Portal 

    • Get Started 

  • Write a Review

Join / Sign In

Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences, and should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in this content nor makes any warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this content, about its accuracy or completeness, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use apply.


Software reviews and ratings for EMMS, BI, CRM, MDM, analytics, security and other platforms - Peer Insights by Gartner
Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQsPrivacyTerms of Use

©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.

All rights reserved.

Reviewed in Last 12 Months
How Alternatives Are Selected
Logo of Amazon Q Developer
1. Amazon Q Developer

By Amazon Web Services (AWS)

4.4
(415 Ratings)

Overall my experience has been positive and good. Specially in non productive or non functional tasks like comparisons, documentation it has helped massively and even in productive tasks for my specific use case (Camunda workflow development) I have seen a 20% improvement so far. A lot of manual effort was saved recently for unification of multiple complicated flows into 1 related to comparisons, input/output variables normalization task. That being said, there is a lot of learning curve at the beginning. Making it understand the Camunda flow context and also requirements was a challenge and I faced issues with UI rendering of created Camunda flows in Camunda modeler tool very frequently. I had to provide specific instructions to correct those for every task. Since we are new users of this tool, it takes a while to trust the output as well but I have reached a more trusting phase now. Overall, it's a solid tool. Will definitely improve overall output however with specific products and context it won't replace developers fully as being projected, it will still remain a good assistant.

Read all insights and reviews for Amazon Q Developer

Where Claude Scored Higher

  • Better at service and support
  • Easier to integrate and deploy
Compare with Claude
Logo of GitHub Copilot
2. GitHub Copilot

By GitHub

4.4
(284 Ratings)

Using GitHub Copilot has become a daily habit for my Selenium/java work. It's not just a fancy autocomplete anymore, the recent updates in have turned it into a proper coding partner. Having our automated test framework on GitHub makes the integration seamless. I use it mostly for boilerplate code, like generating those repetitive page object methods or writing snippets for our api tests. It's incredibly fast at picking up the patterns in the codebase, so it knows exactly how to name the variables and structure the tests without me having to explain it every time. The Copilot agent integration is the real game changer here. Unlike the standard suggestions, the agent can now look at my entire workspace and handle more complex tasks like refactoring an entire test suite or fixing a tricky race condition in our selenium scripts. I can just @workspace in the chat and ask it to find all tests that don't have proper teardown logic and it highlights them and offers a fix in seconds. It's also great for generating documentation for our test cases, which is something I used to spend way too much time on. I use copilot when I want to stay in the flow and write the code myself but with a lot of help. I use it for quick fixes and real-time suggestions, whereas I send the bigger, more time-consuming tasks over to other AI tools that I also use along with Copilot. Together, they make a powerful team. Copilot helps me with the logic and small details, and the other one handles the heavy lifting of building entire scenarios from scratch. It still has those moments where it suggests code that looks right but is actually slightly outdated it doesn't perfectly match our custom framework wrappers. Also, if I am working on a very large file, it can sometimes lose the context of what I was doing three hundred lines up. And just like with other tools, there's always that slight concern about it being a bit hallucinatory with library versions if it has not seen the latest updates yet. But honestly, for the speed and accuracy it provides in my daily Java development, it's hard to imagine going back to coding without it.

Read all insights and reviews for GitHub Copilot

Where Claude Scored Higher

  • Better at service and support
Compare with Claude
Logo of Gemini Code Assist
3. Gemini Code Assist

By Google

4.4
(255 Ratings)

Using the Gemini Code Assist proved to be a very efficient way to check, improve and develop new strengths on my coding abilities. It helped me to be more efficient in my tasks and bring more value to the company.

Read all insights and reviews for Gemini Code Assist

Where Claude Scored Higher

  • Better at service and support
  • Easier to integrate and deploy
Compare with Claude
Logo of Cursor
4. Cursor

By Anysphere

4.5
(85 Ratings)

Cursor has completely changed how I approach my work. Honestly, I'm not sure I could keep up with my current projects without it. I've used it to build out a full Detection-as-Code framework and to get far more value out of our SIEM, particularly around SOAR and automation. The planning mode has been especially useful for breaking complex projects into clear, time-bound phases. It's helped me stay on track while also allowing Cursor to reason through and support genuinely complex tasks alongside me.

Read all insights and reviews for Cursor

Where Claude Scored Higher

  • Better at service and support
Compare with Claude
Logo of Windsurf
5. Windsurf

By Windsurf

4.5
(76 Ratings)

Overall experience has been great, have been using Windsurf for a couple of months now. The efficiency has increased tremendously after introducing it. There's still some room for refinement but worth 4 stars.

Read all insights and reviews for Windsurf

Where Claude Scored Higher

  • Better at service and support
  • Easier to integrate and deploy
Compare with Claude
Logo of Augment Code
6. Augment Code

By Augment Code

4.8
(41 Ratings)

Excellent AI coding assistant that boosts developer productivity wit accurate, context aware code suggestions.

Read all insights and reviews for Augment Code
Compare with Claude
Logo of Qodo
7. Qodo

By Qodo

4.5
(35 Ratings)

Qodo is very significant tool that helps in generating high-quality code. It's simple to test code and fix bugs with Qodo. Code translation is now simple with Qodo.

Read all insights and reviews for Qodo
Compare with Claude
Logo of Codex
8. Codex

By OpenAI

4.5
(29 Ratings)

Codex has been a strong productivity boost for well-scoped engineering tasks like refactors, test fixes, and codebase Q&A. We use it both in the cloud agent experience and locally through Codex CLI, and it works best when you give it a clear goal plus a way to verify results.

Read all insights and reviews for Codex

Where Claude Scored Higher

  • Better at service and support
  • Better evaluation and contracting
Compare with Claude
Showing Result 1-8 of 24

Top Alternatives to Claude

  • Amazon Q Developer
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Gemini Code Assist
  • Cursor
  • Windsurf
  • Augment Code
  • Qodo
  • Codex
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Claude
  4. /
  5. Alternatives
Logo of Claude

Claude Alternatives

4.7(65 Ratings)

Considering alternatives to Claude? See what this market Claude users also considered in their purchasing decision. When evaluating different solutions, potential buyers compare competencies in categories such as evaluation and contracting, integration and deployment, service and support, and specific product capabilities.

Check out real reviews verified by Gartner to see how Claude compares to its competitors and find the best software or service for your organization.