KnowBe4 Cloud Email Security Alternatives

4.6(39 Ratings)

Considering alternatives to KnowBe4 Cloud Email Security? See what this market KnowBe4 Cloud Email Security users also considered in their purchasing decision. When evaluating different solutions, potential buyers compare competencies in categories such as evaluation and contracting, integration and deployment, service and support, and specific product capabilities.

Check out real reviews verified by Gartner to see how KnowBe4 Cloud Email Security compares to its competitors and find the best software or service for your organization.

Reviewed in Last 12 Months

How Alternatives Are Selected

1. Forcepoint DLP

4.4

Our overall experience with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention has been mixed, and I would like to start with the challenges related to the agent. Compared to other solutions we have used, Forcepoint agents are updated very frequently - almost every 1-2 months. It is difficult to rely on a stable agent version, as new issues often arise and are later fixed through patches and new agent releases. One of the biggest challenges this creates is in agent deployment. Unlike other solutions that support seamless in-place upgrades on endpoints, Forcepoint requires us to redeploy agents using additional tools, which is not user-friendly. Another limitation is the lack of real-time visibility into agent status. In other systems, it is easy to see whether an endpoint is connected, disconnected, or has lost connection over time. However, in the Forcepoint management console, it is not always possible to clearly determine whether a device is currently active or if an agent has stopped working. We have also experienced issues with version stability. After the release of version 10.4 (following 10.3), several problems were encountered by organizations that upgraded. Versions were withdrawn, fixed, and re-released, but issues persisted, requiring another rollback and update cycle. In our opinion, such releases should undergo more thorough testing before being deployed to production environments, rather than effectively being tested in customer environments. Additionally, macOS agents have not always performed reliably in our experience. The inline proxy mode, while available, has not proven to be stable. Although it can still capture incidents without browser extensions, it may cause unnecessary browser blocking or create issues when accessing certain websites. Based on our testing, this mode negatively impacts user experience and has not been suitable for our environment. One of the most critical weaknesses is in the Application channel. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention performs quite poorly in this area, particularly with default Microsoft applications. For example, applications like Link to Windows or apps installed via Microsoft Store (such as WhatsApp or Telegram) are not properly detected for incident generation. The main issue is that Forcepoint relies on identifying applications via .exe files, whereas Microsoft Store applications do not operate in the same way. When we raised a support case, we were advised to block RuntimeBroker.exe for Microsoft Store WhatsApp. However, this process is not specific to a single application - many system components rely on the Runtime Broker. As a result, implementing such a block led to a large number of false positives and user dissatisfaction. Ultimately, we were unable to apply an effective and targeted control for these applications, which we consider to be one of the major limitations of the solution. Another limitation we have encountered is related to file fingerprinting. There is no option to define a custom similarity threshold when detecting matches. The percentage is fixed, and we cannot adjust it to better suit our requirements. Furthermore, when a fingerprint rule is created and applied to the printer channel, it does not function as expected-fingerprinting does not work on the printer channel. We have also observed issues with Pattern and Phrase detection. Even when configuring rules with the "only unique" option enabled, the system treats the same word written in uppercase and lowercase as different entries. This behavior can lead to excessive false positives, especially when specific thresholds are configured.Read all insights and reviews for Forcepoint DLP

Where KnowBe4 Cloud Email Security Scored Higher

Better at service and support

Compare with KnowBe4 Cloud Email Security

Add to Compare

2. Cisco Umbrella

By Cisco Systems

4.4

My overall experience with Cisco Umbrella has been very good. It has a stong DNS layer security and it blocks the malicious domains before establishing a connection with them . It is also a cloud-based SAAS solution so it works well for all types of users like remote users, on premise users, etc.Read all insights and reviews for Cisco Umbrella

Compare with KnowBe4 Cloud Email Security

Add to Compare

3. Trellix Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

4.5

We have been using Trellix DLP for almost one year in our organization to monitor and protect sensitive data across endpoints and network. The solution provides strong policy control, device control, and data monitoring features. Deployment requires careful planning, but once configured, the product works reliably and provides good visibility into user activity and data movement. The support response was satisfactory and the documentation was helpful.Read all insights and reviews for Trellix Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Where KnowBe4 Cloud Email Security Scored Higher

Better at service and support

Compare with KnowBe4 Cloud Email Security

Add to Compare

4. Symantec Data Loss Prevention

4.5

It gives us a very refined level of control to protect our data and prevents unauthorized attempts to transfer sensitive data across all channels including endpoints, email and cloud.Read all insights and reviews for Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compare with KnowBe4 Cloud Email Security

Add to Compare

5. Proofpoint Enterprise Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

4.5

Proofpoint's DLP platform is pretty comprehensive covering Email, Endpoint, and Cloud.Read all insights and reviews for Proofpoint Enterprise Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compare with KnowBe4 Cloud Email Security

Add to Compare

6. CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection

4.7

Our experience with CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection has been genuinely good overall.From the beginning, we sawa noticeable improvement in visibility into data movement, especially around identifying potential insider risks,which was a gap for us earlier. It also fits well with rest of the CrowdStrike ecosystem, so managing everything from one place has made our work easier.The initial setup required some effort, particularly in fine-tuning policies and managing alerts effectively.It wasn't too complex,but it did take some time to get things right.Once we moved past that phase, things became much smoother. Overall, it's a strong solution, but it does need some investment in time to get the best results.Read all insights and reviews for CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection

Compare with KnowBe4 Cloud Email Security

Add to Compare

7. Adaptive Email DLP

4.6

It offers robust security, including behavioral analytics to detect abnormal behavior and effortlessly detects anomalies such as malicious links and/or sending sensitive data to the wrong address. Once Adaptive Email DLP detects threats, it automatically encrypts email data and blocks threats that would otherwise result in data loss or data leaks, thus ensuring data compliance. Read all insights and reviews for Adaptive Email DLP

Compare with KnowBe4 Cloud Email Security

Add to Compare

8. GTB Technologies DLP

By GTB Technologies

4.7

Good experience with product as well as customer care service.Read all insights and reviews for GTB Technologies DLP

Compare with KnowBe4 Cloud Email Security

Add to Compare

Showing Result 1-8 of 56