Name: Review of Navan
Item: Navan
Rating: 4.4
Author: Verified Reviewer

Reviewed in Last 12 Months

How Alternatives Are Selected

1. Concur Expense

By SAP

4.2

(575 Ratings)

We use Concur in our company to input and manage our expenses. The solution improved in the last years with new features for the user experience. Upload files and images is easy and fast also from the Mobile App and with the AI the solution recognize some important details so the process is shorter. However some parts are still complex (for example when you manage customer intertainment cost where you need to insert many details in different tabs).

Read all insights and reviews for Concur Expense

Where ExpenseOnDemand Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with ExpenseOnDemand

Add to Compare

2. Webexpenses Expense Management

By Webexpenses

4.4

(383 Ratings)

The granular breakdown of expenses is really easy - just from a single expense, I can very easily see buttons to split payments and tagging colleagues. It takes what would feel like a more complex expense report, and makes it stress-free. I don't need to write in lots of context, as the forms allow me to feel confident in what I'm filling out due to the options available. Specifically, I really like that when I submit an expense, I can calculate the mileage with the built-in maps. Not only this, but because it links in with our HR software. It's literally a one-click for me to move between the two services. When I reflect on my daily use of web expenses, this saves me a lot of time.

Read all insights and reviews for Webexpenses Expense Management

Where ExpenseOnDemand Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with ExpenseOnDemand

Add to Compare

3. Expensify

By Expensify

4.4

(150 Ratings)

Interface is great and well thought out. The mobile app capabilities take the admin legwork out of expense reporting. Have experienced some bugs when saving a receipt directly on the mobile app or even on the browser, this has gotten a few team members in trouble since there was no record of recovery. Customizable to your organization and friendly to users, encouraging prompt submission and reporting. There are ways to over-engineer it, but as long as the internal processes are optimized, we feel like Expensify can grow and scale with us as our organization becomes more complex

Read all insights and reviews for Expensify

Where ExpenseOnDemand Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with ExpenseOnDemand

Add to Compare

4. Zoho Expense

By Zoho

4.6

(137 Ratings)

Overall, Zoho Expense has given us quite an exceptional experience in tracking and managing our operational expenses. Zoho Expense makes it easy for us to collect and consolidate all our expenditure data like receipts, making it possible to efficiently track all our expenses. It has helped us to effectively utilize our financial resources without overspending and also allows us to ensure we don't go beyond the budget we have allocated for every particular operation.

Read all insights and reviews for Zoho Expense

Where ExpenseOnDemand Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with ExpenseOnDemand

Add to Compare

5. Rydoo

By Rydoo

4.6

(125 Ratings)

We have had a very positive experience with Rydoo. Start with Sales (when we run an RFP) up to the final implementation. Everything went well and smoothly - always professional. Overall, we have internally improved significantly the time needed to submit expenses, and we used the implementation to ensure policies and governance are put in place, globally. We finally have efficient, transparent and intuitive workflows in place with the help of Rydoo which leads to improved reimbursement times, better control over expenses and approvals.

Read all insights and reviews for Rydoo

Where ExpenseOnDemand Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with ExpenseOnDemand

Add to Compare

6. Ramp

By Ramp

4.6

(119 Ratings)

As the primary A/P admin, I have found the invoice processing experience to be seamless. On the few occassions where payment information was entered incorrectly, support was quick to respond and resolve the issue. The ability to edit transactions makes this process user friendly. It's also simple to find the information I need within just a few clicks. Overall, Ramp has streamlined our invoice processing by leveraging AI to draft memos, auto-populate fields, and even split and calculate line items. It has noticeably reduced the time spent on all of these manual tasks.

Read all insights and reviews for Ramp

Where ExpenseOnDemand Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with ExpenseOnDemand

Add to Compare

7. Mobilexpense MXP

By Mobilexpense

4.3

(103 Ratings)

Recurring expenses needs to be filled in every time. You can not list frequent, recurring expenses as "favorites". Search in projectcode is very limited, so therefore time consuming. I miss the functionality you can add on you mobile phone an expense, bty just making a picture and do an upload to the MXP environment.

Read all insights and reviews for Mobilexpense MXP

Where ExpenseOnDemand Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with ExpenseOnDemand

Add to Compare

8. Coupa

By Coupa

4.3

(74 Ratings)

We are a fast growing, global organization and Coupa has enabled us to Scale, supporting us in our rapid growth with flexibility, yet control. Coupa has allowed us to also view our spend under management, leverage spend guards to flag non-compliant users, and ultimately maintain control as we build out our global presence, while maintaining speed.

Read all insights and reviews for Coupa

Where ExpenseOnDemand Scored Higher

Better at service and support
Easier to integrate and deploy
Better evaluation and contracting

Compare with ExpenseOnDemand

Add to Compare

Showing Result 1-8 of 32