Review Summary
See a synthesized overview of the key takeaways from verified reviews of Jira Service Management.
See a synthesized overview of the key takeaways from verified reviews of Jira Service Management.
Atlassian's mission is to unleash the potential of every team. We make agile & DevOps, IT service management and work management software to help teams organize, discuss, and complete shared work. Over 300,000 companies of all sizes worldwide rely on Atlassian to help their teams work better together and deliver quality results on time
Do You Manage Peer Insights at Atlassian?
Access Vendor Portal to update and manage your profile.
As said earlier, I liked the fact that we can integrate with Atlassian products and with other products and communication between teams is the star feature I liked the most and coming to the remaining things like ticket handling or assignment and automation and customizations, these are also the things I would say I liked them. Also, the main thing is the service portal, it is user friendly once we get used to it. This is also the one I liked the most as we can submit the requests and track them easily and this supports the teams to get up to date info and tracking. Also, one more attractive thing is the customization of flows, automatic assignments and reporting. These are also the standouts of this product which is Pro features for the IT operations as they typically deal with the reporting and clear issue assignments which reduces their workload and helps work better.
The best part about it is that it includes solid ITSM capabilities. Ticket management, workflow management, and request management all work effectively and efficiently. The second great thing is that it offers reporting and multichannel capabilities. This allows us to manage our team's productivity better and receive requests from various sources. It is even integrated with Atlassian applications such as Jira Software.
What I like most about Jira is the way it brings shape and visibility to routine work. It makes it easy to track responsibilities across programs, assign ownership, and quickly recognize what's in progress or pending without having to do constant follow-ups. I find the ability to configure workflows especially useful, given that it can be tailored to fit how unconventional teams work instead of forcing a hard and fast way. Another thing I appreciate is how accurately it helps collaboration. Updates, comments, and interest history are all in one area, which minimizes back-and-forth communication and keeps everything documented. Once the initial setup is in place, it will be a reliable tool to help teams stay prepared and aligned. Another helpful feature was that of dashboards and reports that made the team's progress more visible. I thought the integration with other tools was helpful in reducing unnecessary maual effort and increasing efficiency. Based on my own experience, it serves best when the team is managing mutliple projects and support tasks simultaneously.
I would say it is better for large teams, because for small teams we need the same complex initial implementation and setup as for large teams. Complex administration is what makes it somewhat difficult for the admins but on an overall the setup is worth the product usage. One more thing as mentioned earlier, it integrates with other products, but with Atlassian products strong integration is there but it is somewhat lacking with the outside product integrations. Although it provides vast integration support it finds it something missing int hat part. Also as mentioned previously the interface as someone who is a beginner they may find it difficult to understand once understood then as that is also mentioned it will be a great experience. My point in saying this is that the UI is not that intuitive to the user in the initial days. Also, as the organization grows bigger, the licensing cost grows too, but on a scale we can say it's worth the services to the cost of licensing.
Some features seem restricted. Automation is effective for simple tasks, but restrictive when more complicated cases need to be addressed. CMDB and data management are less efficient than what other enterprise ITSM solutions offer. There may be some difficulties associated with customization, especially when there are large or complicated configurations to manage.
One component that I don't like about Jira is that it can be a bit complex, especially for new users. The variety of layout options is powerful, but it also makes the familiar layout and navigation hard to find.Overwhelmingly, simple changes occasionally require more than one step, which can gradually slow things down if you're no longer familiar with the gadget. I also feel that performance can occasionally lag while running larger forums or heavily customized workflows. Although these factors are not constant, they do affect the public experience at times. The other issue that could be improved upon relates to the learning process during the first stage of set-up and customization. SOme guidance will definitely be needed for the teams to fully understand how to use the various features. The good thing is that once the system is set up, everthing else becomes easy.