• HOME
  • CATEGORIES

    • CATEGORIES

    • Browse All Categories
  • FOR VENDORS

    • FOR VENDORS

    • Log In to Vendor Portal
    • Get Started
  • REVIEWS

    • REVIEWS

    • Write a Review
    • Product Reviews
    • Vendor Directory
    • Product Comparisons
  • GARTNER PEER COMMUNITY™
  • GARTNER.COM
  • Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQPrivacyTerms of Service
    ©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
    All rights reserved.
  • Categories

    • No categories available

      Browse All Categories

      Select a category to view markets

  • For Vendors

    • Log In to Vendor Portal 

    • Get Started 

  • Write a Review

Join / Sign In
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Wrike
Logo of Wrike

Wrike

byWrike
in
4.4
Market Presence: Product Roadmapping Tools for Software Engineering, Project and Portfolio Management (Transitioning to Strategic Portfolio Management)

Overview

Product Information on Wrike

Updated 1st June 2026

What is Wrike?

Wrike is the trusted work delivery platform where AI extends what people can accomplish. By centralizing all work in one governed, context-rich environment, Wrike helps organizations streamline collaboration, project planning, and task execution while maintaining the control and accountability that complex work demands. Key features include AI Agents, Wrike Copilot, Wrike MCP Server, workflow automations, customizable dashboards, real-time collaboration tools, and advanced reporting. Powered by the Wrike Work Intelligence (R) Graph, AI acts reliably inside the same roles, permissions, and access controls as your people, making AI-driven actions part of the auditable record of how work gets done. More than 20,000 organizations worldwide trust Wrike to deliver their most important work.

Wrike Pricing

Wrike software uses a subscription-based pricing model with multiple tiers and features that scale according to the plan chosen, including options for individuals, growing teams, and organizations. Pricing is structured by user count and feature set, with distinct per-user monthly rates for different package levels.

Overall experience with Wrike

Data and Analytics Manager
<50M USD, Healthcare and Biotech
FAVORABLE

“Wrike Supercharges Teams Coordination and Asychronous Work, but Delivers Best Results with Strong Governance”

5.0
Dec 15, 2025
Every interaction I've had with Wrike's team has been genuinely positive. Their people show up prepared, they know their product inside and out, and they take their time to understand how we work before they throw "best practices" at us. Whenever we've had questions or hit the occasional snag, support has been responsive and helpful. They've always offered clear solutions and options rather than generic KB advice. Wrike has become a system that our company relies on and the Wrike team had treated our desired success as their goal. This combination of expertise, follow-through, and real customer care has made our adoption smoother and helped us get more value out of the platform.
Manager
<50M USD, Software
CRITICAL

“Wrike is intuitive for basic project management but needs improvement in automation, reporting and admin governance for complex projects”

3.0
May 8, 2026
Wrike is a capable project management tool and works well for basic project tracking and collaboration. However, as proect compleity increases, the platform becomes harder to manage, especially in areas such as reporting, dashboards, automation, and administrative control. While the core functionality is stable, the product requires improvements in customizatoin and usability for advanced project management needs.

About Company

Company Description

Updated 25th July 2024

Wrike provides a cloud-based platform that aids organizations and teams in enhancing productivity through collaborative efforts. The platform brings together members and tasks in one workspace to improve workflow and focus on important tasks. It can be used across all departments of an organization, providing a comprehensive digital environment. The platform is highly customizable to fit the specific needs of any team, project, or department. Wrike simplifies task assignment, collaboration, and progress tracking while integrating seamlessly with existing technology systems. It links task completion to business results, eliminating the need for data collection from various sources. Additionally, it offers data-driven decision-making tools to facilitate higher yields on investment. Wrike also offers specific solutions for marketing teams, professional service teams, and service organizations like agencies and consulting firms.

Company Details

Updated 26th February 2025
Company type
Private
Year Founded
2006
Head office location
San Diego, United States
Number of employees
1001 - 5000
Website
https://www.wrike.com/

Do You Manage Peer Insights at Wrike?

Access Vendor Portal to update and manage your profile.

Key Insights

A Snapshot of What Matters - Based on Validated User Reviews

Top Wrike Alternatives

Logo of Smartsheet
1. Smartsheet
4.5
(2825 Ratings)
Logo of Asana
2. Asana
4.6
(2060 Ratings)
Logo of Jira
3. Jira
4.4
(1694 Ratings)
View All Alternatives

Peer Discussions

Wrike Reviews and Ratings

4.4

(1751 Ratings)

Rating Distribution

5 Star
45%
4 Star
44%
3 Star
10%
2 Star
1%
1 Star
0%
Why ratings and reviews count differ?

Customer Experience

Evaluation & Contracting

4.4

Integration & Deployment

4.4

Service & Support

4.4

Product Capabilities

4.4

Filter Reviews
Sort By:
Most helpful
Last 12 Months
Star Rating
Reviewer Type
Reviewer's Company Size
Reviewer's Industry
Reviewer's Region
Reviewer's Job Function
  • Data and Analytics Manager
    <50M USD
    Healthcare and Biotech
    Review Source

    Wrike Supercharges Teams Coordination and Asychronous Work, but Delivers Best Results with Strong Governance

    5.0
    Dec 15, 2025
    Every interaction I've had with Wrike's team has been genuinely positive. Their people show up prepared, they know their product inside and out, and they take their time to understand how we work before they throw "best practices" at us. Whenever we've had questions or hit the occasional snag, support has been responsive and helpful. They've always offered clear solutions and options rather than generic KB advice. Wrike has become a system that our company relies on and the Wrike team had treated our desired success as their goal. This combination of expertise, follow-through, and real customer care has made our adoption smoother and helped us get more value out of the platform.
  • Data and Analytics Manager
    1B-10B USD
    Manufacturing
    Review Source

    Wrike Supports Complex Project Scenarios But Requires Careful Platform Administration

    5.0
    Jan 16, 2026
    Wrike has proven to be a very flexible project management tool to support complex and niche scenarios, it's very easy for end-users to adopt and the ability to create a plan and then see that plan executed live in real-time by the team's is powerful and quite unique to Wrike; I've not really seen it achieved anywhere near as easily in other products. It works best when you empower teams to adopt and use it first and then standardise their ways of working overtime, but this does mean that for a larger implementation like ours you will want to carefully plan how you'll govern and administrate the platform so that things like custom fields don't become a mess. It's good for you if you want that combination of collaborative workforce management and project planning, I wouldn't recommend anything else. It's also good if you will need a lot of customisability. If you just want a project management tool alone though then it's neither better or worse than competitor products.
  • Manager
    <50M USD
    Software
    Review Source

    Wrike is intuitive for basic project management but needs improvement in automation, reporting and admin governance for complex projects

    3.0
    May 8, 2026
    Wrike is a capable project management tool and works well for basic project tracking and collaboration. However, as proect compleity increases, the platform becomes harder to manage, especially in areas such as reporting, dashboards, automation, and administrative control. While the core functionality is stable, the product requires improvements in customizatoin and usability for advanced project management needs.
  • Manager, Project Management
    10B+ USD
    Healthcare and Biotech
    Review Source

    Flexible Deployment and Consistent Service Noted; Interface Improvements Still Desired

    5.0
    Jan 26, 2026
    The Wrike team has been supportive throughout the vetting process, administrative steps to getting agreements in place, and planning and deployment. The level of existing guidance to support planning and deployment has been extremely helpful in orienting our planning team and setting us up to ensure the Wrike professional services team was able to drop into our planning process with minimal ramp up time.
  • Director Of Business Applications
    <50M USD
    Consumer Goods
    Review Source

    Tool Enables Deep Collaboration Across Departments But High Cost Limits Access

    5.0
    Feb 12, 2026
    A highly flexible tool that adapts seamlessly to our complex structure. It allows for deep collaboration by bridging the gap between internal multi-departmental teams and external consultants. The platform acts as a 'single source of truth', making it easy to track varied workflows and maintain visibility across diffierent business units.
...
Showing Result 1-5 of 1752

Recommended Gartner Insights

  • Market Guide for Product Roadmapping Tools for Software Engineering
Powered by Google TranslateThis service may contain translations provided by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement. Gartner's use of this provider is for operational purposes and does not constitute an endorsement of its products or services.

Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences, and should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in this content nor makes any warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this content, about its accuracy or completeness, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use apply.


Software reviews and ratings for EMMS, BI, CRM, MDM, analytics, security and other platforms - Peer Insights by Gartner
Community GuidelinesListing GuidelinesBrowse VendorsRules of EngagementFAQsPrivacyTerms of Use

©2026 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.

All rights reserved.

Reviewer Insights for: Wrike
Deciding Factors: Wrike Vs. Market Average
Performance of Wrike Across Market Features

Wrike Likes & Dislikes

Like

Wrike has completely changed how to coordinate work. We're not a huge organization (around 40 people), but we're spread out geographically, and Wrike gives us a shared single source of truth for what's being done, who owns it, and what needs to be done next. The Biggest win is how well it supports asynchronous work. People can make progress on a project or task, leave context, tag the right teammates, and keep our work moving along without constant check-in meetings or endless emails. The result is clearer handoffs, fewer dropped balls, and a level of communication and coordination we honestly did not think we would ever achieve.

Like

The support team has been responsive and helpful whenever we raised questions or issues. The user community forum is also active and provides useful guidance and support for the various tickets raised. Additionally, Wrike is intuitive for basic task creation, tracking and collaboration, which helped our teams get started quickly

Like

1) The low-tech basics are really good, using it with email is seamless as each task or project has a unique email address, and the ability to copy and paste entire worksheets back and forth from Excel has meant we've been able to coax even the most die-hard Excel planners to give it a go. There are a lot of easy to learn, small but effective time saving features. 2) It's very responsive and reliable, even when you're making changes to thousands of tasks at once it will handle it with barely any delay. 3) Wrike Integrate is a brilliant automation feature-set, although some-what technical to learn, you can essentially automate anything. You will want people dedicated to learning and using it though. 4) The support and account management teams are an absolute breath of fresh air, always helpful, really want to understand the business and you just feel that if you need something and they can do it they will. 5) The blueprint capability combined with their request forms lets our teams engage multiple teams at once on complex pieces of work which can save a huge amount of time.

Dislike

1. Internet dependent. If you're offline, you're stuck. There's no real offline mode or way to download a cached set of projects/tasks to work on them and sync changes back when online again. 2. Learning curve is steep. Onboarding has greatly improved since we first stared, but Wrike is anything but instant for brand-new users. People need dedicated time to learn how your organization uses the tool. It helps to have a dedicated individual within your organization to support training, onboarding, and adoption. 3. Task/project sprawl. Wrike is powerful, which also means it can grow messy and fast. Without solid governance, you will end up with uncontrolled sprawl. Having a Wrike Owner or Wrike Controller makes a huge difference in keeping things organized. Wrike could assist with such a role by having better controller tools that allow for bulk management on a system-wide scale.

Dislike

The reporting and dashboard functionality needs significant improvement. While reports are available, customization options are limited, and exporting reports does not provide enough flexibility in format and structure Automation is another area where we face challenges. In projects where tasks run in parallel, the automation rules often become confusing and difficult to control. This impacted our timelines and created additional complexity in tracking scope and progress, as the automation workflows did not adapt well to non-linear task dependencies. Performance was also a concern. While working on large project plans (around 500 lines/tasks), Wrike consumed significant system resources and slowed down overall performance. This was observed both in desktop application and browser version (My system was using 12GB RAM but still faced the challenge) Administrative access controls are not very clear. Even as an overall admin, visibility and access to user created spaces was restricted in ways that were difficult to manage. Blueprint visibility and ownership levels were also unclear, making governances more complicated. From a security standpoint, while basic audit history is available, advanced monitoring such as tracking file downloads is restricted to higher tier plans. This might be a limitation for organizations that require stronger document control and audit tracking.

Dislike

1) Whilst the customisability is great for us, I can absolutely see how it wouldn't be for those who just want something out-of-the-box and we do sometimes find we would want to just use a pre-built integration rather than to build one through Wrike Integrate or the API. 2) Whilst there's been a lot of recent improvements in account administration features there can still be gaps in tools to help admins manage the system, and without careful planning things like access management, views or folder structures can quickly become a mess. 3) Wrike Dashboards are really good at helping the operational teams deliver against the plan but we often find Reports and Wrike Analyse feature-poor and a bit clunky to use. 4) Wrike defaults to an 8-hour day and tends to track things hour-by-hour, this means it can be complex to use it for scenarios where planning multiple sequential events per hour, or when planning scenarios where you may be covering two operational shifts over a 16 hour day, for example.